To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body

Meeting Information



2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 

REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF APPEALS

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 28, 2001

5:30 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416

1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE

(1)PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting.

(2)COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS.

(3)APPEAL NO. 00-036

MATTHEW WONG, Appellant

vs.

TAXICAB COMMISSION, Respondent

[Revocation on March 2, 2000, of Taxicab [Medallion No. 942.

[RESOLUTION NO. 2000-17.

[FOR REHEARING TODAY.

(4)APPEAL NO. 00-197

MACEDONIO GUERZON, Appellant

vs.

TAXICAB COMMISSION, Respondent

[Revocation on October 13, 2000, of [Taxicab Medallion #196.

[RESOLUTION NO. 2000-91.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5)APPEAL NO. V00-010

ALI KHOSTOVAN, Appellant

vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[1133 Hayes Street.

[Denial on December 9, 1999 of Parking [Variance (to add one unit to an existing five-[unit building without providing the required [parking space).

[(JURISDICTION GRANTED ON JANUARY [12, 2000).

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 99.613V.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(6)APPEAL NO. 00-161

ROBERT T. HOLLAND, dba "EDWARD II BED AND BREAKFAST", Appellant

vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[3155 Scott Street.

[Order to Cease Violation of the Planning [Code dated September 11, 2000 for [billboard exceeding 24 feet in height [constructed without proper permits on the [west-facing wall of the building.

[PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AFTER [TESTIMONY DECEMBER 6, 2000.

[FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION [TODAY.

Items (7A) and (7B) shall heard together

(7A)APPEAL NO. 01-021

POTRERO BOOSTERS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN. & DOGPATCH NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN., Appellants

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[691 Tennessee Street.

[Protesting issuance on January 10, 2001, to [Robert Miller, permit to Erect a Building (25 [live/work units).

[APPLICATION NO. 9917435S.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7B)APPEAL NO. 01-022

POTRERO BOOSTERS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN. & DOGPATCH NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN., Appellants

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[691 Tennessee Street.

[Protesting issuance on January 10, 2001, to [Robert Miller, permit to Demolish a Building [(metal shed).

[APPLICATION NO. 9917436.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

Items (8A) and (8B) shall heard together

(8A)APPEAL NO. 01-039

RICK HOLMAN, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[445 Bryant Street.

[Protesting issuance on January 29, 2001, to [Armax, Inc., permit to Demolish a Building [(office building).

[APPLICATION NO. 9912958.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8B)APPEAL NO. 01-040

RICK HOLMAN, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[445 Bryant Street.

[Protesting issuance on January 29, 2001, to [Armax, Inc., permit to Erect a Building (eight [live/work units).

[APPLICATION NO. 2000/09/15/7935S.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9)APPEAL NO. 01-025

ASPEN CREEK PARTNERSHIP, Appellant

vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[165 - 10th Street.

[Zoning Administrator determination dated [January 19, 2001 that of the total of 11,758 [gross s.f. of the pre-existing office space, [the balance of the gross floor area of the [second and third floors, a total of 3,289 s.f. [gross floor area of the pre-existing office [exist at the subject property, 2,445 gross s.f. [on the second and 844 gross s.f. at the third [floor, and that 4,216 gross s.f. on the ground [floor has been continuously occupied as [office space since 1991 despite an apparent [lack of Planning Department approval.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10)APPEAL NO. 01-036

BRENDAN HALLINAN, dba "SAN FRANCISCO WALL-SCAPES", Appellant

vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[1601 Mission Street.

[Disapproval by the Zoning Administrator on [February 1, 2001 of a building permit [application to install a general advertising [sign on the auto service station for the [reason that Planning Code Section 607(h) [does not allow such signs in a C-M (Heavy [Commercial) Zoning District.

[APPLICATION NO. 2000/10/24/3840.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

Date posted: March 22, 2001