January 26, 2011
COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
City Hall, Room 408
Members Present Staff Present
President Kay Gulbengay Executive Director Emily Murase, PhD
Vice President Julie Soo Fiscal Policy Analyst Laura Marshall
Commissioner Katherine Munter Senior Gender Policy Analyst Anu Menon
Commissioner Andrea Shorter Grants Administrator Carol Sacco
Commissioner Stephanie Simmons Commission Secretary Cynthia Vasquez
Korean Fellow Sook Ja Kim
Graduate Intern Katherine Ray
Graduate Intern Fatemah Simmons
Excused: Commissioner Carolene Marks and Rebecca Prowda
I. CALL TO ORDER/ AGENDA CHANGES
President Gulbengay called the meeting to order at 5:05 pm and gave welcoming remarks. President Gulbengay welcome welcomed newly appointed Commissioner Stephanie Simmons.
Action: To approve the meeting agenda.
No public comment.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
President Gulbengay asked Commissioners to review the minutes from December 10, 2010.
Commissioner Soo provided edits.
Action: Approve amended minutes from December 10, 2010.
No public comment.
III. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT
A. Executive Director's Report
Dr. Murase directed Commissioners to her written report. Dr. Murase welcomed Commissioner Stephanie Simmons to the Commission. Dr. Murase welcomed UC Berkeley Goldman School of Public Policy Intern Fatemah Simmons, and UC Berkeley School of Social Work Intern Katherine Ray. Dr. Murase introduced Sook Ja Kim, Director of the Family Policy Division, Ministry of Gender Equality & Family in
· Violence Against the Girl Child – Responses to Family Violence and Human Trafficking
· How Women Learn to Earn from Rural
Dr. Murase and Ms. Kim attended the Working Families Policy Summit in
Dr. Murase announced that the Request for Proposal for the next 3-year grant cycle, 2011-2014, was released this week and will be due on February 25. A bidder's conference is scheduled for February 1. The Department is seeking community members to serve on the review panel for each of the 6 funding categories: Crisis Line, Intervention & Advocacy, Legal Services, Prevention and Education, Emergency Shelter Services, and Transitional Housing. She welcomed recommendations for panelist from Commissioners.
Dr. Murase reported that, in December, Senior Gender Policy Analyst Anu Menon and Policy Director Ann Lehman held a conference call with the Australian government about a potential collaboration, and on the Departments CEDAW work and the Gender Equality Principles Initiative.
Fiscal Policy Analyst Laura Marshall reported that the San Francisco Collaborative Against Human Trafficking (SFCAHT) is sponsoring a variety of events that began on January 11 and will wrap up with a final event in mid February. Ms. Marshall reported attending training on the response to human trafficking within law enforcement and the community. The Department and UNIFEM will be co-hosting a lecture and film screening on the 21st century slave trade on Friday, January 28 and welcomed Commissioners to attend. There is also an exhibit at the San Francisco Main Library that will be on display until March 3, called Modern Day Slavery. On February 7, there will be panel discussion at UC Hastings to discuss forms of relief for survivors of trafficking. Ms. Marshall also announced that the Modern Day Abolitionist Award Ceremony will be held at the film screening of The Dark Side of Chocolate on Friday, February 11.
Commissioner Soo expressed her concern over an article in the San Francisco Examiner at the
Dr. Murase announced that the 2011 International Women’s Day Summit will be held on Tuesday, March 8 at the Kabuki Hotel. Commissioner Andrea Shorter explained her enthusiasm for this upcoming event. The organizing partners are meeting and discussing possible panels, including one on the feminization of water politics.
Finally, Dr. Murase met with staff from the City’s Administrator’s Office to discuss completion of a centralized database with information on City Commissions and Taskforces. The data would include vacancies, and terms for all City Commissions and Taskforces.
Commissioner Shorter requested that the Department keep recently appointed Attorney General Kamala Harris’ office appraised of the work being done on human trafficking. SFCAHT has had great conversations Attorney General Harris and she would like to be kept in the loop with anything that can help her and her administration make strides forward on human trafficking. Dr. Murase reported that, in 2005, then-District Attorney Harris teamed up with Assemblymember Sally Leiber to enact the first Anti-Trafficking Act in
1. Introduction of the City Attorney Alicia Cabrera
2. Status Update on Calvert Memorandum of Understanding
Both agenda items were handled simultaneously. Dr. Murase introduced City Attorney Alicia Cabrera who has been with the City for 5 years and working with the Department for the past 2 ½ years. President Gulbengay explained that she requested an update on the status of the Department’s Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Calvert Group, Ltd. since questions arose at the Commission retreat in December.
Senior Gender Policy Analyst Anu Menon explained that the Department’s MOU with Calvert on the Gender Equality Principles Initiative materials (GEP) and website is up for renewal in March. The Calvert Women's Principles (CWP) are the basis of the Gender Equality Principles (GEP). The GEP was created jointly by Calvert and the Department on the Status of Women and, as such, is jointly owned by both entities. The Department has partnered with Calvert for the past 3 years on the GEP. As part of this work, we jointly developed a website tool where companies can go to evaluate how gender equitable the workplace is. The MOU was developed to clarify the ownership interests in the GEP tools, including the website. At the outset, the Department worked closely with City Attorney Miriam Morley, based on guidance from President Gulbengay. When it came to working on the language of the MOU, the Department worked very closely with Aiden Varah, whose specialty is intellectual property. Ms. Menon and Policy Director Ann Lehman, who are both trained attorneys, worked with the City Attorney’s Office staff in developing the MOU that was executed in June 2010.
Dr. Murase reported that, in August 2010, she met with President Gulbengay, Commissioners Soo and Munter, Ms. Menon, and City Attorney Adine Varah to review the MOU and discuss potential changes to be made upon renewal. There were 3 areas of clarification requested by Commissioner Soo and responded to, as follows:
· Calvert provided an organization chart to ensure transparency and to confirm the Calvert did not have a separate consulting arm that could profit from the GEP.
· The MOU clarified ownership of the GEP, including the website and related materials. The GEP principles are co-owned and co-copywritten by Calvert and the Department. The website is owned by the Department.
· A definition page was developed to ensure that terms used in the MOU were clear and concise.
Dr. Murase acknowledged Commissioner Soo and Munter, and President Gulbengay for their assistance on the MOU and with the City Attorney’s Office. Dr. Murase highlighted Commissioner Soo’s effort in conducting a line by line analysis and raising the concerns she encountered. Commissioner Soo explained that, as a Commissioner, she has the power of inquiry which she decided to exercise, and as a
Ms. Cabrera explained that according to the City Charter, the entire Commission sets policy. While there is the power of inquiry, no single Commissioner can take action alone. It is up to the full Commission to set a policy for department. If there is no precedent for reviewing a specific MOU, the Commission can set a policy directive for the Department Head or give parameters or guidelines. Commissions set up specific parameter. For example, if a contract goes over a specific amount, then the Commission would have to review it. Ms. Cabrera also announced that since Ms. Varah would be on leave, that she will be the one to continue to work with the Department.
Ms. Menon explained that Ms. Varah worked closely with the Calvert Attorney to address Commissioner Soo’s concerns. Commissioner Munter wanted clarification on whether edits to the original MOU would have to be approved by the Commission. Ms. Cabrera explained that this would be a policy decision that the Commission would have to adopt.
Commissioner Shorter explained that the Department is thankful for the partnership with Calvert and the great work that come from it. Commissioner Shorter requested clarification whether the conduct of any commission that has attorneys on it would put a Commissioner in jeopardy with the Bar Association. Commissioner Shorter requested clarification with regards to this specific MOU. Ms. Cabrera explained that she prefers not to give conflict advice in a public forum. Each case would be fact specific and individualized. A meeting could be set up with the Commissioner who has questions that would address who the MOU is addressing and the appropriated role of the Commissioner. Ms. Cabrera offered to meet with individual Commissioners and discuss his/her situation and advise accordingly. Ms. Cabrera will follow up with Commissioner Shorter.
President Gulbengay thanked Ms. Cabrera for her work with the Department and her continued support. President Gulbengay explained that the Department relies on the expertise and knowledge of the City Attorney. For a future agenda item, President Gulbengay will request someone from the Ethics Commissions to make a presentation at a future Commission meeting.
IV. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed hereunder constitute a Consent Agenda and are considered to be routine by the Commission on the Status of Women. They will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Commission. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the Commission so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered as a separate item. Members of the public may speak on each item listed on the Consent Agenda.
Action: To approve the Consent Agenda.
A. Resolution Recognizing the Centennial of Women’s Suffrage in
B. Resolution Recognizing Amanda Heier for Her Tenure at the
C. Resolution Recognizing Judith Klain for Her Service to the City and
D. Resolution Recognizing Dianne M. Easton On the 25th Anniversary of Leadership
E. Resolution Recognizing Lisa Caper for Her Tenure at the Dream House
F. Approval of JaMel Perkins to Serve on the Justice and Courage Oversight Panel
Action: To approve the Consent Agenda.
Dr. Murase explained how essential Ms. Caper has been at Dream House one of the newer agencies funded by the Department. Ms. Caper expressed appreciation for being acknowledged by the Commission.
Kathy Black, Executive Director of La Casa de las Madres, expressed her support for the appointment of JaMel Perkins to the Justice and Courage Oversight Panel.
Ms. Black expressed her pleasure in working with Amanda Heier former Director of the Mary Elizabeth Inn (MEI). During her tenure, Ms. Heier made a difference in the lives of many different women. Currently there are 165 women housed at MEI.
Beverly Upton, Executive Director of the Domestic Violence Consortium, echoed Ms. Black’s sentiments and looks forward to working with Ms. Perkins on the Oversight Panel and continuing to make progress.
Ms. Perkins thanked everyone for their support and explained that she brings 20 years of experience to the Oversight Panel and looks forward to working with the Oversight Panel.
Dr. Murase also announced that the Board of Supervisors passed a resolution, introduced by Supervisor Malia Cohen, to mark the 100th Anniversary for Women’s Suffrage.
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. Comprehensive Report on Family Violence in
1. Laura Marshall, Fiscal and Policy Analyst, Department on the Status of Women
Ms. Marshall explained that the Family Violence Council produced the report, Comprehensive Report on Family Violence in
· Expanded child welfare information
· Family Court restraining order statistics
· Child Support Services and CalWORKS data
· Elder Financial Abuse information
· 3-year trends for most indicators.
Ms. Marshall shared various data from the Criminal Justice Agencies. Ms. Marshall explained that one great accomplishment is being able to gather data on stalking calls now that there is a 911 call code for stalking related calls, which was not the case before October 2008.
2. Karen Roye, Executive Director, Department of Child Support Services
Ms. Roye thanked the Family Violence Council for their work on the report and the support of Department staff. Ms. Roye explained how the Report is a valuable tool, providing a wider perspective in family violence. At the Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) case workers often deal with victims of domestic violence and receive training annually on how to work with victims, which in the majority of cases are women. Ms. Roye explained that her agency seeks to empower parents to provide economic support for their children. DCSS works with custodial parents to ensure that children and families receive financial support. Mr. Roye explained that abusers use control of money, resources, housing, custody, and other necessities to maintain control and often make it difficult for a victim to leave. Once a victim leaves and they seek social services they must identify the non-custodial parent and the City will pursue child support from that individual. If the client states that this will be put into a dangerous situation, DCSS will keep track of the information, but will not proceed with the child support case. Personal contact information in domestic violence cases is automatically redacted to ensure a client safety. If a client has to attend court proceedings, arrangements can be made to attend by being on the phone or in another room. DCSS works to gain support from the non-custodial parent at a reasonable amount, and to ensure that the child is being financially supported but also to ensure that the parent will be able to support him or herself. There are many obstacles to secure child support including incarceration, lack of stable housing, earning only minimum wage.
The Family Violence Council has served as a conduit to learn what other services are being provided by other departments and agencies. It has also provided information for referrals for clients, the opportunity to learn of various trainings, and to build relationships with other departments and agencies. The Report is the first step in evaluating the data and is a work in progress. It serves as a valuable tool to see what the problems are, who are the victims, and how can we help them.
2. Beverly Upton, Executive Director, Domestic Violence Consortium and Tri-Chair of the Family Violence
Ms. Upton thanked the Commission and Department for their support and expressed how Ms. Roye’s leadership has been stellar. Ms. Upton reported on the huge leaps in progress that have been made from having all interested parties around the table as a part of the Council. The Council has brought together leaders who have not previously worked together. The Council will continue to seek partnerships from stakeholder organizations including the courts and the school district. Ms. Upton thanked all participants in developing the Report that will serve as a tool to show what is actually going on in the City, what services are being provided, and what services continue to be needed.
President Gulbengay excused herself at 6:35 pm, and requested that the record show her vote to not approve the proposed budget.
B. FY2011-2012 Proposed Budget
Commissioners reviewed the proposed budget for FY11-12. Dr. Murase explained that, per budget instructions, she is required to propose budget cuts to the Mayor’s Office and must, reluctantly, propose cuts to the Violence Against Women (VAW) Grants program. Dr. Murase explained that the level of staffing has been cut over the years. The proposed cuts must come from general fund allocations. The Department met with the Partner Agencies to discuss the across the board funding cuts, explaining the proposed cuts of 15%.
The Partner Agencies requested that the Commission reject the proposed budget cuts. Roberta Toomer, Executive Director of Woman Inc., thanked the Commission for its leadership. Ms. Toomer explained that agencies continue to provide services to more clients with less funding. Ms. Toomer requested that the Commission reject the recommended cuts.
Vanessa Flores with Asian Women’s Shelter, thanked the Commission and Department for their advocacy and support. Ms. Flores requested that the Commission not approve the recommended budget cuts.
Maria Chavez, Executive Director of the
Janelle White, Executive Director with San Francisco Women Against Rape, acknowledged the Commission for historically supporting the Partner Agencies and not supporting the proposed budget cuts. Ms. White expressed her concern of how the proposed cuts would affect clients. The Partner Agencies continue to serve more clients at less funding levels.
Imelda Herrera, with the Mission Neighborhood Centers RAICES program, explained how many youth are benefiting from the services they are providing. Funding from the Department has provided clients with educational trips and college tours. Ms. Herrera asked the Commission to reject the proposed budget cuts.
Rachel West with Women in Dialogue requested the Commission not approve the proposed budget cuts.
Amy Yu with APA Family Services thanked the Commission and Department for their support of women and domestic violent victims. Ms. Yu urged the support of the Partner Agencies and a no vote on the proposed cuts.
Action: To reject the budget for FY11-12.
C. Commission Roles/Duties
Vice President Soo requested this item be continued at the February Commission meeting.
Action: To include continue this agenda item to the February Commission meeting.
VII. PUBLIC COMMENT
Vice President Soo expressed her concern on the issue of finger printing in relation to Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Secure Communities program where the finger prints are used for deportation purposes. If that practice continues it will have a chilling effect in reporting violence.
Ms. Upton explained that she has been asked to be a part of the victim services transition team and is bringing forward the concerns of Commissioner Soo. Ms. Upton explained that people are being fingerprinted at the time of arrest and not at conviction. The fingerprints are being reported the ICE within minutes of being fingerprinted. The fingerprinting program is an option for each state and
Action: Motion to adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 7:15 pm
City Hall is accessible to persons using wheelchairs and others with disabilities. Assistive listening devices are available and meetings are
open-captioned. Agendas are available in large print. Materials in alternative formats, American Sign Language interpreters, and other accommodations will be made available upon request. Please make your request for alternative format or other accommodations to the Department on the Status of Women at 415-252-2570. Providing at least 72 hours notice prior to the meeting will help to ensure availability.
The nearest BART station is
Know Your Rights under the Sunshine Ordinance (Chapter 67 of the
Government’s duty is to serve the public, reaching its decision in full view of the public. Commissions, boards, councils and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people’s business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people’s review. For more information on your rights under the Sunshine Ordinance, or to report a violation of the Ordinance, contact the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force at 415-554-7724. To obtain a free copy of the Sunshine Ordinance contact the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, City Hall, Room 244, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, San Francisco, CA 94102-4689, phone: 415-554-7724, fax: 415-554-7854. Copies of the Sunshine Ordinance can also be obtained from the San Francisco Public Library and on the City’s website at www.sfgov.org. If any materials related to an item on this agenda have been distributed to the Commission after distribution of the agenda packet, those materials are available for public inspection at 25 Van Ness,
Lobbyist Registration and Reporting Requirements
Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance [SF Campaign & Governmental Conduct Code § 2.100] to register and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the San Francisco Ethics Commission at