To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body

Meeting Information



girls_committee

2009 2008 2007 2006 

 

Girls Committee

Monday, March 5, 2007

5:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.

City Hall, Room 421
San Francisco, CA  94102

 

MINUTES

 

             I.      CALL TO ORDER /ROLL CALL                                                  

   Action: Andrea Shorter called the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m.

 

   Committee Members Present:

   Andrea Shorter, Member, Commission on the Status of Women

   Madeline Ing, Member, At-Large

   Dawn Liu, Member, SFUSD Student Advisory Council Representative

   Melissa Padilla, Member-elect

 

   Committee Members Absent (excused):

   Talia Anderson, Youth Commission Representative (via Supervisor Daly’s Office)

   Passionae Anderson, Member-elect, Center of Young Women ’s Development

   Representative

 

   Staff Present:

   Kim-Shree Maufas, CEDAW Policy Analyst, Department on the Status of Women

 

   Public present:

   GiRLFeST Bay Area Co-Directors: Jessmaya Morales and Maria Blanco (also with Pilar

   Marketing)

  

          II.      ADOPTION OF AGENDA                                      

   (Commissioner Shorter explained parliamentary procedure for public meeting purposes

   to committee members so in the future when committee are chairing meeting they will

   consistently request for motion, second, discussion and public comment when

   appropriate).                

A.         The agenda was approved for the February 5, 2006 Girls’ Committee

        Meeting (as amended).  Action: D. Liu moved, M. Ing seconded the motion carried.

 

       III.      ADOPTION OF MEETING MINUTES

A.         The meeting minutes were approved for the December 7, 2006 Girls’ Committee

  Meeting.  Action: M. Ing moved, A. Shorter seconded, the motion carried.

 

        IV.      INTRODUCTIONS & GIRLS COMMITTEE BUSINESS                     

A.         Introductions     

        Informally members introduced themselves.  Current committee membership consists of

        four people. Thus 50 % plus 1 (or 3 members) constitutes a quorum of the committee until

        the full membership has been seated.

 

B.         DOSW A Report on Girls: Benchmarks for the Future

        Executive Summary Review    

        Commissioner Shorter importance of Girls Report and the motivation for its

        creation.   The report was introduced as the lead document that should guide the

        committee’s work going forward.

       

        “In this detailed snapshot, the San Francisco Commission and Department on the Status of Women take

           an in-depth look at middle and high school girls in the City and County of San Francisco. We began the

process by asking a series of questions:

• Who are the girls and young women of San Francisco?

• What measurements exist to see how they are doing?

• What is the racial, ethnic, educational, economic and health make-up of San Francisco girls?

• What is their experience in the criminal justice system?

• How do issues of safety and violence affect their daily lives?

• What can we discover at the local level that will help us to inform and advise policy makers and service providers about San Francisco girls’ immediate and future needs?

We were surprised that the answers to these questions were not readily available. For example, many institutions still do not make a distinction between girls and boys in their data collection practices. The major result of not disaggregating data based on gender, especially in the juvenile information arena, is that little is known about the political, social, physical and economic state of girls as separate from boys. Even when information specific to girls exists, it is often scattered among various government and private agencies and difficult to access. Collecting this information in a central place and encouraging the sharing of information are major goals of this project. This report answers the questions above based on documented research and collected information from local, state and national sources.”

                                                           Introduction, The Commission/Department on the Status on Women’s

                                                           2003 Report on Girls: Benchmarks for the Future.

 

Commissioner Shorter solicited comments about the report.  Ms. Liu commented on the size of the youth population as compared to the adult population in San Francisco.   San Francisco provides many youth services, access to services is an issue. She noticed the boy/girl education comparisons throughout the report.  Ms. Ing noted that her focus was on youth and safety issues in the South of Market (SOMA) neighborhoods, such as youth programs and services in less residential areas that youth may congregate. Policy Analyst Maufas commented that the work of the committee would be dedicated towards the updating the Girls Report.

 

Commissioner Shorter suggested that the next committee meeting focus on the education component of the report.  Committee members agreed and cited personal examples of current education issues that exist for girls and for young people in general.  Added to the agenda for the next committee meeting were: 1) the rates of girls educated in San Francisco entering colleges, particularly women’s colleges; 2) San Francisco programs for youth, for boys (only) and for girls (only); and finally for the committee members to look at issues using a “gender lens”.

 

           V.      OLD BUSINESS

A.     Graduate Intern Update:

      Policy Analyst Maufas informed committee members that the Department attended the San            Francisco State University Graduate School of Social Work  Intern Conference and

      collected 5 resumes from students interested in working at the department.

 

B.     GiRLFeST – Update (July 19-20, 2007)                                         Discussion/Action

Jessmaya Morales and Maria Blanco, the Co-Directors for the 2007 GiRLFeST Bay Area, presented updated information regarding GiRLFeST to the committee members.  Everyone reviewed GiRLFeST “needs” and task list broken into 3 categories: committee members’ responsibilities, Department responsibilities, and responsibilities for both to work together.  The committee members reviewed a support letter from the Department on the Status of Women to community and city departments.  Committee members had a lengthy discussion regarding what it would mean to enact a resolution to support GiRLFeST.  Action: Shorter moved to approve resolution as written, Ms. Liu seconded, the motion to adopt COSW’s Girls Committee Resolution #2007-001 was carried.

 

C.     Girls Services Directory

      Policy Analyst Maufas explained information in committee member’s packets about all of

      the various organizations that have their own directories of information (thus far the word

      document was 12 pages long).  Committee members offered ideas about what they wanted

      for the new Girls Services Directory. For example, the committee discussed the inclusion of

       “Young Life” youth groups (middle-school age and high school-age) that is a world-wide

      religious-based organization that has a youth focus that has been in existence since 1941.

 

        VI.      NEW BUSINESS

 

A.     2007 Girls Committee Projects

1. Committee brainstorming (February 2007). Committee members reviewed their brainstorming sheets and added ideas to their respective areas of concerns for girls.  Ms. Padilla wanted to have “sports” become an integral part of the girls report possibly under the health component.

 

B.     Girls Committee Chairperson Selections

1.  Chairing assignments of 2 months per Committee Member completed.  Committee members selected respective months, then members switched assignments based on the understanding that members that are high school seniors may not be in San Francisco.   Commissioner Shorter suggested that those members chair earlier meetings.  Draft of Girls Committee calendar will be in April 2007 committee members’ packet for approval.

 

     VII.      PUBLIC COMMENT                                                                DISCUSSION
There was no public comment.  

 

  VIII.      ANNOUNCEMENTS                                                               DISCUSSION  

A.     Upcoming “Girl-Focused” Events

1.      The Recreation and Parks Department “Girls In Sports” Survey, encouraging girls to take online survey at http://www.sfgov.org/site/recpark_index.asp, located under the Department's Programs and Features Menu. Committee members were encouraged to tell girls and friends to take the survey that is online for girls. 

 

B.     Women’s History Month: Women Making History San Francisco Event

1.      Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 3:30 PM in the Board of Supervisors Chambers, City Hall, Room 263 then immediately following, a presentation in the Mayor’s Chambers, Room 201. Commissioner Shorter explained that Women’s History supports and celebrates women who are doing extraordinary things for women and girls. 

 

C.     Upcoming Commission on the Status of Women Meetings
1.  Wednesday, March 28, 2006 at 5p.m. – City Hall, Room 408. Commissioner

            Shorter let members know that they are requested to attend so that

            the Commission body could meet them.

 

D.    Next COSW Girls Committee Meeting

      1.  Monday, April 16, 2007 at 5p.m. – City Hall, Room 034.

        IX.      ADJOURNMENT                                                                             ACTION        

           Action: A. Shorter, moved; M. Ing, seconded; ayes approved.

           Meeting adjourned at 7:09 p.m.

 

American Sign Language interpreters and a Sound Amplification System provided upon request with 48-hour advance notice to 415-252-2570. Translation into languages other than English is also available with 48-hour notice. Limited accessible street parking available.  Accessible MUNI Metro station in the Van Ness Station and lines are J, K, L, M and N.  Accessible MUNI Lines are the 6, 7, 9, 42, 47, 49, and 71 lines.   Accessible seating for persons with disabilities (including those using wheelchairs) will be available.  Meeting proceedings available in alternative formats.  In order to assist the City's efforts to accommodate persons with severe allergies, environmental illness, multiple chemical sensitivity or related disabilities, attendees at public meetings are reminded that other attendees may be sensitive to various chemical based products.  Please help the City to accommodate these individuals.  To obtain a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to participate in the meeting, please contact the Department on the Status of Women at least two business days before the meeting at 415-252-2570 (Voice) or 415-252-2550 (TTD).  The Board of Supervisors has amended the Sunshine Ordinance by adding provision 67A.1.  The provision is effective as of January 21, 2001. The ringing of and use of cell phones, pagers, and similar sound producing electronic devices are prohibited at this meeting.  Please be advised that the Chair may order the removal from the meeting room of any person(s) responsible for the ringing or use of a cell phone, pager or other similar sound-producing electronic devices. Explanatory documents: For copies of explanatory documents listed in this agenda, and other related materials received by COSW, please contact the Department on the Status of Women at 25 Van Ness Ave, Suite 130, San Francisco, CA  94102; phone:  415-252-2570, fax:  415-252-2575.   Also, to the extent possible, documents will be available on the COSW website at http://www.sfgov.org/cosw.

 

Know Your Rights under the Sunshine Ordinance

(Chapter 67 of the San Francisco Administrative Code)

Government’s duty is to serve the public, reaching its decision in full view of the public. Commissions, boards, councils and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people’s business.  This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people’s review.  For more information on your rights under the Sunshine Ordinance, or to report a violation of the Ordinance, contact the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force at 415-554-7724.  To obtain a free copy of the Sunshine Ordinance contact Frank Darby by mail to Administrator, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, City Hall, Room 244, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, San Francisco, CA 94102-4689, phone: 415-554-7724, fax: 415-554-7854, or by email: at sotf@sfgov.org.  Citizens interested in obtaining a free copy of the Sunshine Ordinance can request a copy form Ms. Destro or by printing Chapter 67 of the San Francisco Administrative Code on the Internet, http:// www.sfgov.org/sunshine. Attention: Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance (SF Campaign & Governmental Conduct Code § 2.100 – 2.160) to register and report lobbying activity.  For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the San Francisco Ethics Commission at 25 Van Ness Ave., Suite 2200, San Francisco, CA  94102; phone: 415-252-3100, fax: 415-252-3112 and web site at http://www.ethics.commission@sfgov.org.

.

 

Lobbyist Registration and Reporting Requirements

Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance [SF Campaign & Governmental Conduct Code § 2.100] to register and report lobbying activity.  For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the San Francisco Ethics Commission at 25 Van Ness Ave., Suite 2200, San Francisco, CA  94102; phone: 415-252-3100, fax: 415-252-3112 and web site at http://www.ethics.commission@sfgov.org.

.