To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body

Meeting Information



EnvironmentalCommittee

2009 2008 2007 2006 

ASTHMA TASK FORCE

SANFRANCISCOBOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Environmental Committee

Minutes

 

Date:   April 19, 2006, 2-4pm                                                                                                                     Location:   DPH, Fox Plaza

                                                                                                                                                                   

Committee Members Present:  Neil Gendel, Healthy Children Organizing Project; Louise Kimbell, DBI; Karen Cohn, DPH; Benjamin Heckman, La Croix Davis

Staff and Guests: Anjali Nath, ATF Advocacy Coordinator; Mary Higgins, HERC

Absent: Raymond Manion, Dept of Environment; Myrna Melgar Iton, Mayor’s Office of Housing; Louise Hill, USEPA; Mae Ling Dea, DBI Vince Fabris, DBI; San Francisco Housing Authority; Joseph Ossai, Housing Inspector, DBI

 

Meeting Notes/Decisions

Desired Outcome

Introductions & Sign In

Facilitator:  Karen Cohn                                Recorder:  Anjali Nath

 

 

1. Review Agenda and Minutes

Minutes of 2/15 to be approved at next meeting

 

2.      Complete SFHA MOU

Reviewed SFHA MOU draft.  Linked to evaluation discussion.  Agreed to incorporate evaluation questions into the MOU.

Karen will revise MOU

3.      Prepare for SFHA Hearing

Neil expressed importance of linking our work to the bigger picture (connect with other community groups) as well as the smaller picture with more manageable goals. 

 

We are ready to schedule a hearing and speak to Connie Chan. Will depend on camera purchase.  Answer evaluation questions as a baseline, meet with SFHA and review MOU/brief SFHA.  Request Supervisor Maxwell to send hearing request via letter with MOU.  Get press to hearing (Bay Guardian, use PMC to pitch a story to SF Chronicle, City Hall reporter Rachel Gordon)

 

We really want change in SFHA

Discussed potential involvement of SFHA Commission

Meet with Supervisors prior to hearing.

Pre-hearing strategy:

Briefing w/tenant advocacy groups ( HERC, POWER, Green Action)

w/ Supervisor Sophie Maxwell

w/ SFHA

w/ other Supervisors (Mirkarimi, Peskin, Daly)

w/ Mayor’s Office (Policy & Planning Director)

Karen will talk to Connie Chan and schedule a date

 

Karen will speak to purchaser

 

Anjali will send a get well card to N. Boyd.

 

Karen will talk to Eileen Shields

 

Anjali may invite PMC to next meeting on May 17

 

Anjali/Karen will speak with Connie Chan to help us arrange pre-hearing meetings.

4. Brainstorm about Tenant Evaluation Measures (moved to first item)

Mary Higgins of HERC attended.  Described HERC’s home visiting project.  Karen reviewed history and current efforts with SFHA.

 

Flyer has helped make the call and evaluation. But not the followup.  Extreme conditions they got relocated (i.e. when water heater explodes, sheet rock falling down.  Mary expressed that as a result of the intervention 1 out of 4 tenants have improved their housekeeping behavior.  Much of the lack of housekeeping is due to depression (young mom’s) – lifestyle issues.

 

Louise suggested that there needs to be a priority of causal factors.  Linkage between building issues.

Need to make case for how issues are related.

 

How would we evaluate that money being spent for SFHA is benefiting tenants?  Committee brainstormed possible measures.

Mary said that an “Opportunity House” at Alice Griffith can be used to educate tenants.  ATF could help make link for HERC to use this building.  Mary submitted a grant for chronic obesity which she might be able to use the opportunity house for.

  How do we measure tenants’ perception of improvements in their housing and how do we show the change?

-Need to discuss how to show that the camera had a direct effect on a tenant’s improvements.  Tenants may not realize that the camera is linked to the improvements they see.  Other social factors might influence this.

-Timeliness measure – look at what factors need to be addressed more immediately than others.

-We are dealing with presumptions outreach workers and SFHA maintenance might make – assuming

 

Ben suggested that we evaluate Tenant, Housing Authority (Maintenance Supervisor) and 3rd party perspective.

SFHA – you’ve used the camera, how do you think this has helped

3rd party – CAFA evaluation tools, City Controller, Grand Jury report on SFHA conditions, need to approach Nancy Pelosi

 

SFHA Maintenance Measures:  (change in procedures)

What has the camera done for you?

Did camera help you find something you wouldn’t have?

Comparison of number of complaints/ratio of building envelope

Compare recurrences of routine versus complaint based (1 camera is to be used for each)

Change in timeliness of response

Change in perception of whether an issue is a building or a tenant issue

-Did camera ID building envelope issues as opposed to surface mold issues?

-Were more jobs that you responded to building versus tenant housekeeping?

-Are you getting repeat complaints about moisture problems?

-On your annual housekeeping inspections, do you see less tenants housekeeping issues related to moisture/mold problems, and pests?

- Do you have other concerns about the housing conditions that might impact the health of occupants? (related to healthy housing)

Do you think the moisture problem was fixed

 

SFHA Property Managers Measures:  (change in culture, behavior, attitude toward tenants/needs)

Did you feel more effective in getting the tenants the fixes they needed to get?

Do you perceive a change in tenant housekeeping behaviors that lead to mold (link to need to pass annual housekeeping inspections)?

-Are you getting repeat complaints about moisture problems?

-On your annual housekeeping inspections, do you see less tenants housekeeping issues related to moisture/mold problems, and pests?

- Do you have other concerns about the housing conditions that might impact the health of occupants? (related to healthy housing)

 

Tenant Measures: (change in perception of changes/improvements)

Address lack of scheduled repair date (relates to lack of respect)

Is there a change in how your maintenance requests have been handled/scheduled? – Did you feel you had a concrete date?

-Did you receive a date of when to expect the repair?  Did it occur within a week of the scheduled date?

-Was the repair effective? – Did you have to call about the complaint a second time?

Did it get fixed and did it work?

-Do you have other concerns about the housing that impact your health? (related to healthy housing)

 

3rd Party Measures:

Has the building envelope problem been IDed and repaired as opposed to surface problem?

Do you have other concerns about the housing conditions that might impact the health of occupants? (related to healthy housing)

 

These questions will be incorporated into the MOU.

 

Anjali will bring evaluation suggestions to CAFA in order to get appropriate evaluation tools

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Follow-up with SFHA to get a representative to fill the vacant non-voting seat and participate on the committee (get assistance from Supervisor Maxwell)

 

 

 

 

5.  Announcements – no announcements

 

6.  Next Meeting & Agenda

 

 

Next Meetings of Committee: 

a.      Wednesday, May 3, 2006

b.      Wednesday, May 17, 2006