2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF APPEALS
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2000
5:30 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416
1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE (FORMERLY 301 POLK STREET)
(1) PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting.
- COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS.
(3) REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND FIFTEEN-DAY APPEAL PERIOD: 90 Eastwood Drive. Letter from Cheryl Miller, requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over Building Permit Application No. 2000/07/17/5319 issued to Stephen Savin for removal of kitchen fixtures and occupancy separation, restoring the building to single-family occupancy.
|
Date issued
|
July 21, 2000
|
|
Last day to appeal
|
August 7, 2000
|
|
Request for jurisdiction
|
August 14, 2000
|
(4) APPEAL NO. 00-109
|
MARK BRADY, Appellant
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[640 Wisconsin Street.
[Determination by the Acting Zoning [Administrator dated July 6, 2000 [requiring revisions to approved plans [regarding front setback requirements.
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/02/14/1841.
[PUBLIC HEARING HELD AND [CLOSED JULY 26, 2000.
[FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION [TODAY.
|
(5) CONSENT ITEMS: With the consent of the Department of Building Inspection, the Board will proceed to a vote without testimony to reduce the penalty (investigation fee) to two times the regular fee as provided for in the Building Code. Without consent the Board will take testimony and then decide the appeal.
(A) APPEAL NO. 00-138
|
DAN D. BETCHART, Appellant
vs.
DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
|
[1027 Ingerson Avenue.
[Appeal for Refund of Penalty imposed [on August 29, 2000.
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/08/18/8318.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(B) APPEAL NO. 00-141
|
CYNTHIA L. BENNETT, Appellant
vs.
DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[80 Flora Street.
[Appeal for Refund of Penalty imposed [on August 30, 2000.
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/06/15/2717.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(6) APPEAL NO. 00-101
|
KAY LAMMING, Appellant
vs.
DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[268 Chenery Street.
[Protesting issuance on June 16, 2000, [to Zahid Sardar, permit to Alter a [Building (interior remodeling; repair [existing deck; 361 s.f. third story [addition).
[APPLICATION NO. 9812657.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(7) APPEAL NO. 00-119
|
COMMITTEE FOR JOBS, ARTS AND HOUSING, Appellant
vs.
DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[1050 - 17th Street.
[Protesting issuance on July 10, 2000, [to Ciaran Harty, permit to Erect a [Building (19 live/work units).
[APPLICATION NO. 9711381S.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(8) APPEAL NO. 00-120
|
KENNETH SCUDDER & KELLIN DEFIEL, Appellants
vs.
DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[310 Green Street.
[Protesting issuance on July 11, 2000, to [Mitch Menaged, permit to Demolish a [Building (single family dwelling).
[APPLICATION NO. 9915173.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(9) APPEAL NO. 00-121
|
SOPHIA F. ALVAREZ, Appellant
vs.
DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[2800 San Bruno Avenue.
[Protesting issuance on July 11, 2000, to [Edward and Oi Lan Lim, permit to Alter [a Building (legalize seven foot fence).
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/07/11/4859.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(10) APPEAL NO. V00-048
|
ALLAN & LORRAINE THOMPSON, Appellants
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[50 Magnolia/1755 Chestnut Streets.
[Denial on March 22, 2000, of Rear Yard [Variance to relocate one dwelling unit [from the 1755 Chestnut Street building [to the existing rear carriage house at 50 [Magnolia Street by renovating and [adding a floor and roof deck to the [existing building, setting back the new [floor 15 feet from Magnolia Street; the [proposal also includes two 2’x7’ [extensions into the lightwells of the [existing 1755 Chestnut Street building; [the total number of dwelling units will [remain six units.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 99.164V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
ADJOURNMENT.
Note: Each item on this agenda may include the following documents:
1. Appellant’s statement and rebuttal brief.
2. Permit holder’s response and rebuttal brief.
3. Department decision, permit, determination or resolution.
4. Public correspondence.
These items are available for review at the Board’s office, 1660 Mission Street, Room 3036, front counter.
