2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 BOARD OF APPEALS
REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF APPEALS
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2000
5:30 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416
1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE (FORMERLY 301 POLK STREET)
(1) PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting.
- COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS.
(3) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:
REQUESTS FOR JURISDICTION:
ITEM A: 4416-4418 - 19th Street. Letter from Jude and Eileen Laspa, requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over Building Permit Application No. 2000/02/07/1258 issued to Thomas E. Flinn and Kristin J. Peterson for expansion of existing recreation room and bathroom, closet addition, and new interior and exterior stairs on first floor; expand dinette area, demolish and replace existing exterior stairs on second and third floors.
|
Date issued
|
June 6, 2000
|
|
Last day to file appeal
|
June 21, 2000
|
|
Request for jurisdiction
|
July 25, 2000
|
ITEM B: 2855 Scott Street. Letter from Lee and Renee Novich, requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over Building Permit Application No. 2000/07/17/5315 issued to Mitch Menaged for recording drawing permit to reflect as-built conditions for Applications 2000/02/10/1622 and 2000/04/03/6162; lower roof at rear 16’ of building; minor non-structural interior alterations.
|
Date issued
|
July 17, 2000
|
|
Last day to file appeal
|
August 1, 2000
|
|
Request for jurisdiction
|
August 2, 2000
|
ITEM C: 2836-2838 Washington Street. Letter from Rene E. Peinado, requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over determination by Gerald Green, Acting Zoning Administrator requiring revisions to Building Permit Application No. 9903501 which eliminates the illegally constructed habitable roof deck and associated rail-height walls within the required rear yard and replacement of the "existing parapet wall" designation with "remove unwarranted parapet wall at rear, replace with minimal open railing around roof decks areas NOT in required rear yard."
|
Date issued
|
July 7, 2000
|
|
Last day to file appeal
|
July 24, 2000
|
|
Request for jurisdiction
|
August 7, 2000
|
REQUEST FOR REHEARING:
ITEM D: 1432-34 Kearny Street. Letter from Steve Atkinson, attorney for Nathan and Nan Roth, permit holders, requesting rehearing of Appeal Nos. 00-046, 00-047. Hearing July 19, 2000. Upon motion by Commissioner Cullum, the Board voted 4-0 (Vice President Saunders absent) to REVOKE the demolition and site permits.
(4) APPEAL NO. 00-106
|
DONALD & LORI REGALIA, Appellants
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[108 San Jose Avenue.
[Determination by the Zoning Admin-istrator dated June 28, 2000 that the [project in progress at 108 San Jose [Avenue is suspended until revised plans [and permit are submitted and approved [for the staircase penthouse and the last [10 feet of building depth is limited to a [height of 30 feet, with Section 311 [notification requirements to be met for [these revisions.
[APPL. NOS. 9814346S & 9922299S.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(5) APPEAL NO. 00-032
|
DAVID BAKER & JANE MARTIN, Appellants
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[337-339 Shotwell Street.
[Determination by the Zoning [Administrator dated February 16, 2000 [that denies request to designate [combined office and storage Limited [Commercial Use space as one [commercial space; denies request that [the apartment area be 375 s.f.; denies [request that the stables/carriage house [footprint be reduced to its original [dimensions of approximately 20 x 25 [feet; and denies request that the [stable/carriage house be used as a [workshop.
[PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AFTER [TESTIMONY APRIL 12, 2000.
[FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION [TODAY.
|
(6) APPEAL NO. 00-116
|
GREGORY SMIRIN & SARA SMITH, Appellants
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
|
[787 Castro Street.
[Revocation on July 7, 2000, of permit to [Alter a Building (restore legal [occupancy; remove illegal unit, second [kitchen and occupancy separation).
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/04/21/7945.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(7) APPEAL NO. 00-094
|
JOHN L. COOPER, Appellant
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
|
[2857 Divisadero Street.
[Protesting issuance on June 8, 2000, to [Allan Kipperman, permit to Alter a [Building (replace existing window with [like kind and size; change 3’-4" window [to 5’-4" at side yard; fill existing window [at side yard).
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/06/08/2163.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(8) APPEAL NO. V00-041
|
ROBERT & BEATRICE WOOD, Appellants
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[2090 Jackson Street.
[Protesting granting on March 15, 2000, [to Ma Estates, Rear Yard Variance to [construct a four-car, semi-underground [garage and one-story building addition [in the required yard of a single family [dwelling.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 98.908V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(9) APPEAL NO. 00-110
|
JOSEPH FESTINESE, Appellant
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[37 Landers Street.
[Determination by the Zoning Admin-[istrator dated June 28, 2000 that the [Zoning Administrator does not have the [authority to grant a lot size variance to [allow four dwelling units on the 3,125 [s.f. lot because Section 209.1(i) requires [3,200 s.f., one unit for each 800 s.f. of [lot area, and the City Attorney has [determined that the proposed variance [would be tantamount to a rezoning of [the lot.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(10) APPEAL NO. 00-111
|
ORCHARD HOTEL, Appellant
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[665 Bush Street.
[Determination by the Zoning Admin-istrator dated June 26, 2000 that [modification of the off-street parking [requirement for the proposed 10-story [hotel will require conditional use [authorization to modify Planning Com-[mission Motion No. 11619 approved on [March 16, 1989 and a variance from the [Zoning Administrator to allow off-site [parking at 750 Bush Street under a [three year lease with the San Francisco [Parking dba City Park.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(11) APPEAL NO. 00-112
|
SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH, Appellant
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[450 Rhode Island Street.
[Determination by the Zoning Admin-[istrator dated June 28, 2000 that [Macromedia is a business service [company with some components that [could be considered light manufacturing [and is a permitted use in the M-1 (Light [Industrial) zoning district under Planning [Code Sections 222, 226 and 890.11.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
ADJOURNMENT.
Note: Each item on this agenda may include the following documents:
1. Appellant’s statement and rebuttal brief.
2. Permit holder’s response and rebuttal brief.
3. Department decision, permit, determination or resolution.
4. Public correspondence.
These items are available for review at the Board’s office, 1660 Mission Street, Room 3036, front counter.
