2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
REGULAR MEETING - WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2002
5:00 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416, ONE DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE
(1) PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting.
(2) COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS & QUESTIONS:
(3) ADDENDUM ITEMS:
ITEM A: 2518 Union Street. Letter from David Cincotta, attorney for Marc & Lisa Cabi, Appellants, requesting rehearing of Appeal No(s). 02-050, Cabi vs. DBI, PCD, decided June 5, 2002. Upon motion by Vice President McInerney, the Board voted 4-1 (President Chin dissented) to uphold the procedural denial (modification) by the Planning Commission, with conditions as stated into the record by Vice President McInerney, and with findings to be adopted by the Board on June 12, 2002. Findings were adopted June 12, 2002.
ITEM B: 2515-2519 Post Street. Letter from Tina Wollenberger & Rafael Calderon, Requestors, asking that the Board take jurisdiction over Building Permit Application No(s). 2002/03/29/2665. Permit Holder(s): Victor Ume-Ukeje. Project: renovation of each unit, upgrade of bath and kitchen, finishes, lighting, no change to building footprint, and new garage.
Date Permit Issued: March 29, 2002
Last Day to Appeal: April 15, 2002
Date Jurisdiction Request Received: Nov. 22, 2002
(4) CONSENT ITEM (POLICE REVOCATION): With the consent of the Police Department, the Board will proceed to a vote without testimony to overrule the revocation of the subject permit(s) with the condition that the appellants pay all appropriate permit fees. Without consent the Board will take testimony and then decide the appeal.
(4) APPEAL NO. 02-184
|
MINEY LLC dba
“CURVE BAR & RESTAURANT”, Appellant(s)
vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent
|
[ 747 – 3rd Street.
[Appealing the revocation on August 28, 2002, [of Place of Entertainment/Dance Hall Keeper [Permit due to non-payment of fees.
[ACCOUNT NO. 1155.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(5) APPEAL NO. 02-118
|
DAVID LEE, Appellant(s)
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION,
Respondent
PLANNING DEPT. APPROVAL
|
[368 Vallejo Street.
[Protesting the issuance on June 17, 2002, to [Suzanna Dulkinys, Permit to Alter a Building [(renovate kitchen and toilet room at main level, [renovate bedroom to include bathroom, enclose [part of deck for ½ bath, and replace wall [furnaces with direct vent.
[APPLICATION NO. 2002/06/17/9197.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(6) APPEAL NO. 02-123
|
HARRY ANDREWS, Appellant(s)
vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent
|
[20 Cosmo Place.
[Protesting the issuance on June 26, 2002, to [Tim Dale dba “Le Colonial SF Restaurant LLC,” [Place of Entertainment Permit.
[PERMIT NO. 108548.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(7) APPEAL NO. 02-124
|
JOHN McGLYNN, Appellant(s)
vs.
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
|
[358 Elizabeth Street.
[Appealing the denial on June 28, 2002, of [Permit to Remove & Replace One Tree.
[ORDER NO. 173,603.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(8) APPEAL NO. 02-130
|
PAUL LANGLEY
& SCOTT PETERSON
dba “HARVEY’S”, Appellant(s)
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[1582 Folsom Street.
[Appealing a determination dated July 5, 2002, [which recommends that the Police Department [disapprove the Place of Entertainment permit [application for the subject property for the [reason that Planning Code § 817.37 prohibits [new nighttime entertainment uses in the SLR [zoning district, and because neither Planning [nor Police Department records indicate that a [Place of Entertainment permit was ever [authorized for the subject property.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(9) APPEAL NO. 02-132
|
PING KWANG LEUNG dba
“NEW SANG SANG MARKET”, Appellant(s)
vs.
DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondent
|
[1145 Stockton Street.
[Appealing the suspension on July 17, 2002, of a [Permit to Operate for the “New Sang Sang [Market” for the reason that various Health Code [violations were not corrected within the 30-day [correction period.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(10) APPEAL NO. 02-133
|
TIMOTHY HARVEY, Appellant(s)
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION,
Respondent
PLANNING DEPT. APPROVAL
|
[245 Pope Street.
[Protesting the issuance on July 10, 2002, to [Veronica Zermeno, Permit to Erect a Building [(one-story garage with 500sf of ground floor [area).
[APPLICATION NO. 2002/07/10/1010.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(11) APPEAL NO. 02-150
|
JIMMY CHU, Appellant(s)
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[1551 Taraval Street.
[Appealing a Permit Suspension Request dated [July 23, 2002, addressed to Dept. of Building [Inspection Director Frank Chiu, requesting that [Building Permit Application No(s). 9903316S be [suspended for the reason that proper [neighborhood notification under Planning Code [§ 312 was omitted in error.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
[NOTE: PER BOARD MOTION ON NOV. 20, [2002, THIS MATTER IS NOT TO BE CALLED [PRIOR TO 6 PM.
|
ADJOURNMENT.
Note: Each item on this agenda may include the following documents:
1) Appellant's Preliminary Statement of Appeal and Brief; 2) Respondent’s or Permit holder's Response Brief; 3) Appellant’s Reply; 4) Department decision, order, permit, determination, resolution, or Notice of Violation; and 5) Correspondence of public and parties.
These items are available for review at the Board's office, 1660 Mission Street, Room 3036, front counter. Please call 575-6880 if you have any questions concerning this agenda.
Date posted: Dec. 5, 2002
