2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF APPEALS
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2001
5:30 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416
1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE
(1)PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting.
(2)COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS.
(3)APPEAL NO. 00-227
|
NOEL A. GARAY, Appellant
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent
|
[Revocation of Tow Car Operator permit on [October 27, 2000, for failure to pay license [fee.
[PERMIT NO. P43-001155.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(4)APPEAL NO. 00-181
|
ELIZABETH JAMERSON, Appellant
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[1592-1594 Golden Gate Avenue.
[Determination dated September 27, 2000 [by the Zoning Administrator that after review [of the request submitted by the Neighbors of [the New Laguna Market and departmental [records, there is sufficient evidence to [constitute clear intent on the part of the [owner to abandon the Limited Commercial [Use for the subject property.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(5)APPEAL NO. 00-234
|
ROBERT & HARUMI TAI, Appellants
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[5 Freelon Street.
[Zoning Administrator determination dated [November 7, 2000, that no evidence has [been established that demonstrates an [official change in use of the subject property [from "industrial" to "office" as a principal use; [and any current or future attempt to occupy [the subject property as "office" use would be [considered a violation of the Planning [Code.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(6)APPEAL NO. 00-254
|
JEFFREY HEUER, Appellant
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
|
[1409 Noe Street.
[Appeal of Notice of Restriction dated [December 4, 2000 by the Director of the [Department of Building Inspection [prohibiting construction or alteration of any [building or structure except for construction [or alteration of a building or structure with [one residential unit consisting of 1,570 or [fewer square feet until August 14, 2005 [(penalty for unlawful demolition on August [15, 2000).
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(7)APPEAL NO. 00-253
|
NIKOLAJS A. LAPINS, Appellant
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[1 Belgrave Avenue.
[Protesting issuance on December 9, 2000, [to Allan and Marrian Byer, permit to Alter a [Building (replace existing exterior wood [steps as original except for one hour fire-[rated wall; replace lower ground level deck [as original; one hour fire-rated wall at [existing upper deck).
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/12/04/7098.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
Date posted: February 22, 2001
