2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
REGULAR MEETING - WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2002
5:00 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416, ONE DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE
(1)PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting.
(2)COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS & QUESTIONS:
(3)ADDENDUM ITEM(S):
ITEM A: 129 Randall Street. Letter from Paul Curtis, agent for Friends of Randall Street, requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over Building Permit Application No(s). 9911579 & 9911578S. Permit Holder(s): John O’Reilly. Project: demolish a one-story single-family dwelling & construct a three-story, two-unit residential building.
Date Permit(s) Issued: July 11, 2002
Last Day to Appeal: July 26, 2002
Jurisdiction Request(s) Received: August 20, 2002
(4) APPEAL NO. 96-175
|
REBECCA A. VISPERAS, Appellant(s)
DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL
|
[550-552 Athens Street.
[Denial on December 9, 1996, of permit to Alter [a Building (legalize existing use a two family [dwelling on two floors of occupancy).
[APPLICATION NO. 9518320.
FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(5) APPEAL NO. 98-046
|
GERARDO PINTO & MARIANNE RUDDY,
Appellant(s)
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION,
Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL
|
[1506-08 Alabama Street.
[Denial on March 6, 1998, of permit to Alter a [Building (legalize flat on ground floor; add [windows in kitchen and living room; add fan [and light in bathroom; provide fire wall and [door between garage and flat).
[APPLICATION NO. 9802518S.
[PUBLIC TESTIMONY HEARD NOV. 18, 1998, [FEB. 17, 1999, & MAY 29, 2002.
[FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION TODAY.
|
(6) APPEAL NO. 98-117
|
EDWARD R. NUNES, Appellant(s)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[1780 Oakdale Avenue.
[Health Permit Referral determination by the [Zoning Administrator dated June 10, 1998 that [the proposed Non-conforming Commercial [Food Warehouse/Wholesale Sales use in a RH-[1 zone, will terminate at the current five-year [lease expiration on April 30, 2003.
[FOR HEARING TODAY
|
(7) APPEAL NO. V00-048
|
ALLAN & LORRAINE THOMPSON,
Appellant(s)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[50 Magnolia/1755 Chestnut Streets.
[Denial on March 22, 2000, of Rear Yard [Variance to relocate one dwelling unit from the [1755 Chestnut Street building to the existing [rear carriage house at 50 Magnolia Street by [renovating and adding a floor and roof deck to [the existing building, setting back the new floor [15 feet from Magnolia Street; the proposal also [includes two 2’x7’ extensions into the lightwells [of the existing 1755 Chestnut Street building; [the total number of dwelling units will remain [six units.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 99.164V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(8) APPEAL NO. 00-096
|
TREVOR FOOKS, Appellant(s)
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[1623-1625 Noe Street.
[Zoning Administrator’s determination dated [June 13, 2000 that under the RH-2 zoning of [the property, the illegal third basement unit of [the two-unit building must be removed, and [with certain alterations the space may remain [habitable space as part of one of the two lawful [units.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
ITEMS (9A) & (9B) SHALL BE HEARD TOGETHER:
(9A) APPEAL NO. 01-021
|
POTRERO BOOSTERS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN. & DOGPATCH NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN., Appellant(s)
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION,
Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[691 Tennessee Street.
[Protesting issuance on January 10, 2001, to [Robert Miller, Site Permit to Erect a Building [(25 live/work units).
[APPLICATION NO. 9917435S.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(9B) APPEAL NO. 01-022
|
POTRERO BOOSTERS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN. & DOGPATCH NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN., Appellant(s)
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION,
Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[691 Tennessee Street.
[Protesting issuance on January 10, 2001, to [Robert Miller, Permit to Demolish a Building [(metal shed).
[APPLICATION NO. 9917436.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(10) APPEAL NO. 01-040
|
RICK HOLMAN, Appellant(s)
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION,
Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[445 Bryant Street.
[Protesting issuance on January 29, 2001, to [Armax, Inc., Site Permit to Erect a Building [(eight live/work units).
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/09/15/7935S.
[PUBLIC HEARING HELD MAR. 13, 2002, & [FURTHER TESTIMONY HEARD JUNE 12, [2002.
[FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION TODAY.
|
(11) APPEAL NO. 01-115
|
THERESA ISSERMAN, Appellant(s)
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION,
Respondent
|
[700 Vermont Street.
[Protesting issuance on June 20, 2001, to [Raymond & Hazel Guaraglia, Permit to Alter [a Building (demolish existing non-compliant [residential units per Notice of Violation No. [200114983; remove all utilities to ground level; [convert to original commercial space with no [structural work to be done).
[APPLICATION NO. 2001/06/20/1935.
[PUBLIC TESTIMONY HEARD JUNE 19, 2002.
[FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION TODAY.
|
(12) APPEAL NO. 01-213
|
MICAELA LEZCANO, Appellant(s)
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
|
[3560-3566 - 20th Street.
[Denial on October 25, 2001, of Permit to [Remove Two Trees (without replacement).
[ORDER NO(S). 173,215 & 173,232
[ORIGINAL DECISION ON FEB. 6, 2002 TO [UPHOLD DENIAL.
[REHEARING GRANTED JUNE 19, 2002.
[FOR REHEARING TODAY.
|
(13) APPEAL NO. 02-111
|
JUDITH HARDING, Appellant(s)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
Subject Prop. Owner(s): RICHARD
& NORMA DENNES
|
[281 & 285 Edgewood Avenue.
[Appealing a determination dated June 10, 2002, [addressed to Judith Harding, that Variance [Case No. 90.856V has been "utilized" or acted [upon, and that the current configuration of the [subject lots is legal; that no new variance is [necessary to build upon the subject lots as long [as the proposal generally conforms to the [dimensions and scope of the project as [originally described in the variance; and that the [permit applications filed with the Planning Dept. [have been found to conform to the variance and [are subject to the required 30-day [neighborhood notification.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(14) APPEAL NO. 02-131
|
OCEAN BEACH
HOMEOWNER’S ASSOCIATION, Appellant(s)
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION,
Respondent
PLANNING DEPT. APPROVAL
|
[770 La Playa Street.
[Protesting the issuance on July 10, 2002, to the [Progress Foundation, Permit to Erect a Building [(four-story, fourteen-unit building with 3,972sf of [ground floor area).
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/12/20/8432.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(15) APPEAL NO. 02-152
|
SPP REAL ESTATE LLP, Appellant(s)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[Lakeshore Plaza Shopping Center on Sloat [Boulevard.
[Appealing a determination dated July 26, 2002, [addressed to Walter Wong at Jaidin [Consulting, that a hamburger restaurant is not [a permitted use at the subject property [because hamburger restaurants were [specifically omitted as an allowable use by the [Board of Supervisors when it approved [conditions for the Conditional Use (CU) [authorization at Lakeshore Plaza.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(16) APPEAL NO. 02-191
|
CLEMENTINA TOWERS
TENANTS ASSOCIATION, Appellant(s)
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION,
Respondent
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVAL
|
[328 Tehema Street.
[Protesting the issuance on Sept. 6, 2002, to [Todco Development, Permit to Erect a Building [(nine-story, 85-unit residential commercial [building with parking).
[APPLICATION NO. 2001/12/03/4364.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
ADJOURNMENT.
Note: Each item on this agenda may include the following documents:
1) Appellant’s Preliminary Statement of Appeal and Brief; 2) Respondent’s or Permit holder’s Response Brief; 3) Appellant’s Reply; 4) Department decision, order, permit, determination, resolution, or Notice of Violation; and 5) Correspondence of public and parties.
These items are available for review at the Board’s office, 1660 Mission Street, Room 3036, front counter. Please call 575-6880 if you have any questions concerning this agenda.
Date posted: October 24, 2002
