2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF APPEALS
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2001
5:30 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416
1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE
(1)PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting.
(2)ELECTION OF OFFICERS.
(3)COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS.
(4)APPEAL NO. 99-035
|
LUCINDA HAMPTON, Appellant
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[2234-2236 Francisco Street.
[Protesting issuance on November 12, 1998, [to John and Evelyn Schiappacasse, permit [to Alter a Building (remove walls to provide [parking spaces and remove daycare facility).
[APPLICATION NO. 9823286.
[JURISDICTION GRANTED MARCH 18, [1999.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.
|
(5)APPEAL NO. 00-163
|
WILBERT L. & JODI FREEMAN, Appellants
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
|
[180 Leland Avenue.
[Protesting issuance on September 16, [2000, to Donald W. Wong, permit to [Alter a [Building (remove illegal unit including [kitchen, bath, two non-bearing interior walls; [rearrange existing bath and kitchen).
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/09/16/0731)
[PUBLIC HEARING HELD AND CLOSED [NOVEMBER 15, 2000.
[FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION TODAY.
|
(6)APPEAL NO. V00-010
|
ALI KHOSTOVAN, Appellant
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[1133 Hayes Street.
[Denial on December 9, 1999 of Parking [Variance (to add one unit to an existing five-[unit building without providing the required [parking space).
[(JURISDICTION GRANTED ON JANUARY [12, 2000).
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 99.613V.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.
|
Items (7A) and (7B) shall be heard together
(7A)APPEAL NO. 00-088
|
IRON WORKS LOFT VENTURES, INC., Appellant
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[1201 Harrison Street.
[Protesting issuance on May 23, 2000, to [Equilon Enterprises, LLC, permit to [Demolish a Building (food mart and [gasoline fueling facility).
[APPLICATION NO. 9923713.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(7B)APPEAL NO. 00-089
|
IRON WORKS LOFT VENTURES, INC., Appellant
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[1201 Harrison Street.
[Protesting issuance on May 23, 2000, to [Equilon Enterprises, LLC, permit to Erect a [Building (car wash, retail sales/food mart).
[APPLICATION NO. 9919529.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(8)APPEAL NO. 00-200
|
KAREN SNELL, Appellant
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[112 Buena Vista Terrace.
[Protesting issuance on October 13, 2000, to [Jose Cisneros, permit to Alter a Building [(horizontal addition to existing garage and [second floor; new vertical two-story [addition).
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/04/25/8122S).
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(9)APPEAL NO. 00-202
|
THOMAS & MARTINA MURPHY, Appellants
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[598 Hampshire Street.
[Appeal of Notice of Alleged Violation of [Planning Code Sections 222, 233(a) and [233(b) dated October 13, 2000 (property [constructed as a live/work project is being [used as office space without benefit of a [building permit authorizing change in use).
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(10)APPEAL NO. 00-201
|
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL CENTER, Appellant
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[2345 Third Street.
[Determination dated October 16, 2000 that [a perspective tenant, Michael Patrick [Partners, Inc., a 16-person company that [offers corporate identity and branding to a [variety of clientele, is an "office" use under [the Planning Code, which is a principally [permitted use within a M-2 (Heavy [Industrial) zoning district; and that due to [the Investigation of alleged violation of [Planning Code 321, unauthorized creation of [an office development, the Planning [Department will not be able to immediately [approve a building permit for "office" use.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
