2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 BOARD OF APPEALS
REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF APPEALS
WEDNESDAY, JULY 12, 2000
5:30 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416
1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE (FORMERLY 301 POLK STREET)
(1) PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting.
- COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS.
(3) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:
REQUEST FOR REHEARING:
ITEM A: 361 Lombard Street. Letter from Laurence Kornfield, Chief Building Inspector, DBI, requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 00-003, heard May 31, 2000. Upon motion by Commissioner McInerney, the Board voted 5-0 to GRANT the permit with FINDINGS and the following CONDITIONS: the metal pipes in the subject light well be painted a light color and a lattice fence no more than six feet in height be installed in the light well to cover up the metal pipes.
ADOPTION OF FINDINGS:
ITEM B: 361 Lombard Street. Adoption of Findings for above.
REQUESTS FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND FIFTEEN-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:
ITEM C: 616 Rolph Street. Letter from Judith M. West requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over Building Permit Application No. 2000/03/28/5622S issued to Xiang-Si Lei for a rear 2-1/2 story horizontal addition.
| |
Date issued
|
June 2, 2000
|
| |
Last day to appeal
|
June 19, 2000
|
| |
Request for jurisdiction
|
July 3, 2000
|
ITEM D: 75B and 75C Lynch Street. Letter from Hung Yin Cheng requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over Building Permit Application No. 2000/05/04/9072 issued to Jim Byrne to remove two illegal units at basement and convert to storage only.
| |
Date issued
|
May 4, 2000
|
| |
Last day to appeal
|
May 19, 2000
|
| |
Request for jurisdiction
|
July 3, 2000
|
(4) APPEAL NO. 00-036
|
MATTHEW WONG, Appellant
vs.
TAXICAB COMMISSION, Respondent
|
[Revocation on March 2, 2000, of [Taxicab Medallion No. 942.
[RESOLUTION NO. 200-17.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
Items (5A), (5B) and (5C) shall be heard together
(5A) APPEAL NO. 00-085
|
JON T. MAYEDA, dba "CLUB MERCURY", Appellant
vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent
|
[540 Howard Street.
[Appealling conditions placed on Place of [Entertainment permit granted May 24, [2000 regarding extending permits to [ground and upper levels; extending [hours Sunday to Wednesday to 4:00 [a.m. and Thursday to Saturday to 6:00 [a.m.; allowing patrons to enter until [closing; and not limiting to only three [times a year after hours operation [Sunday to Thursday.
[PERMIT NO. 99494.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(5B) APPEAL NO. 00-086
|
JON T. MAYEDA, dba "CLUB MERCURY", Appellant
vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent
|
[540 Howard Street.
[Appealling conditions placed on Dance [Hall Keeper/After Hours permit granted [May 24, 2000.
[PERMIT NO. 99493.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(5C) APPEAL NO. 00-087
|
JON T. MAYEDA, dba "CLUB MERCURY", Appellant
vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent
|
[540 Howard Street.
[Appealling conditions placed on [Extended-Hours Premises permit [granted May 24, 2000.
[PERMIT NO. 99495.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(6) APPEAL NO. 00-040
|
JACQUELINE STAVI, Appellant
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
|
[304 Eureka Street.
[Protesting issuance on March 10, 2000, [to Andrew and Kathleen Lomas, permit [to Alter a Building (remove existing non-[complying stair and replace with [complying stair; smoke detectors).
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/03/10/4097.
[PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AFTER [TESTIMONY MAY 3, 2000.
[FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION [TODAY.
|
(7) CONSENT ITEM: With the consent of the Department of Building Inspection, the Board will proceed to a vote without testimony to reduce the penalty (investigation fee) to two times the regular fee as provided for in the Building Code. Without consent the Board will take testimony and then decide the appeal.
(A) APPEAL NO. 00-091
|
NINA KITOVER, Appellant
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[108 Monterey Blvd.
[Appeal for Refund of Penalty imposed [on June 19, 2000.
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/04/21/7902.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(8) APPEAL NO. 00-076
|
PAUL McKENNA, Appellant
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[5301 Mission Street.
[Protesting issuance on May 8, 2000, to [Main-Kai Liu, permit to Erect a Building [(three-story five-unit dwelling).
[APPLICATION NO. 9914207.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(9) APPEAL NO. 00-100
|
LISLE & ROSLYN PAYNE, Appellants
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[3630 Jackson Street.
[Protesting issuance on June 14, 2000, [to Garrett and Lori Van Wagoner, permit [to Alter a Building (new bay window at [rear façade first floor and balcony [above).
[APPLICATION NO. 9909429S.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(10) APPEAL NO. 00-028
|
JANE SEGAL, Appellant
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[2940 Folsom Street.
[Determination by the Zoning Admin-[istrator dated February 11, 2000, that [the establishment of a commercial [kitchen with or without café is not in [conformity with the use limitations of [RH-2 zoning provisions and is not [permitted, and two-family use is [permitted, and with Conditional Use [Authorization of the Planning Commis-[sion four units could be permitted, since [the lot is 7,475 square feet in area.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(11) APPEAL NO. V00-041
|
ROBERT & BEATRICE WOOD, Appellants
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[2090 Jackson Street.
[Protesting granting on March 15, 2000, [to Ma Estates, Rear Yard Variance to [construct a four-car, semi-underground [garage and one-story building addition [in the required yard of a single family [dwelling.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 98.908V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(12) APPEAL NO. V00-048
|
ALLAN & LORRAINE THOMPSON, Appellants
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[50 Magnolia/1755 Chestnut Streets.
[Denial on March 22, 2000, of Rear Yard [Variance to relocate one dwelling unit [from the 1755 Chestnut Street building [to the existing rear carriage house at 50 [Magnolia Street by renovating and [adding a floor and roof deck to the [existing building, setting back the new [floor 15 feet from Magnolia Street; the [proposal also includes two 2’x7’ [extensions into the lightwells of the [existing 1755 Chestnut Street building; [the total number of dwelling units will [remain six units.
[VARIANCE CASE NO. 99.164V.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
ADJOURNMENT.
Note: Each item on this agenda may include the following documents:
1. Appellant’s statement and rebuttal brief.
2. Permit holder’s response and rebuttal brief.
3. Department decision, permit, determination or resolution.
4. Public correspondence.
These items are available for review at the Board’s office, 1660 Mission Street, Room 3036, front counter.
