To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body

Meeting Information



2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 

BOARD OF APPEALS

CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

REGULAR MEETING - WEDNESDAY, JUNE 13, 2001

5:30 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416, ONE DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE

(1)PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting.

(2)COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS:

ITEM A: Adoption and presentation of resolutions thanking Linda Laws & Xiomara Velez for their years of service with the Board of Appeals.

(3) APPEAL NO. V01-071

STUART FUSS, Appellant

vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[445 - 461 Oak Street.

[Denial on April 9, 2001, of Lot Width, Lot [Size, Open Space, and Exposure Variances [(subdivide an existing 82 x 120 lot with four [existing residential buildings into four [separate lots, each with one residential [building).

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 2000.632V.

[PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MAY 30, 2001.

[FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION TODAY.

(4)APPEAL NO. 01-060

PARAIC O’DONOGHUE, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[182 Brewster Street.

[Protesting issuance on March 19, 2001, to [Patrick J. Fellowes, permit to Erect a [Building (three-story single-family dwelling).

[APPLICATION NO. 2000/03/13/4167S.

[PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED MAY 23, 2001.

[FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION TODAY.

(5)MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUESTS FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD:

ITEM A: 1777 Yosemite and 1760 Armstrong Avenues. Letter from Stephen L. Collier, attorney for Thomas Wojak, Bob Bellucci, Brent Bushnell, Malcolm McClay, and Chickory Miles requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over Building Permit Application Nos. 2001/02/22/2712, 2001/02/22/2724, 2001/02/222693 and 2001/04/23/7505 issued to Les Silverman for removal of bedrooms installed by tenant without permit.

Date issued February 24, 2001, April 23, 2001

Last day to appeal March 12, 2001, May 8, 2001

Request for jurisdiction May 21, 2001

(5)MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE CONTINUED:

REQUESTS FOR JURISDICTION BEYOND 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD CONTINUED:

ITEM B: 807 Columbus Avenue. Letter from Irene Lee requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over Building Permit Application No. 9826331S issued to Michael Strausz for a two-story vertical addition of six residential units over an existing single-story commercial structure.

Date issued May 7, 2001

Last day to appeal May 22, 2001

Request for jurisdiction May 29, 2001

ITEM C: 310 Corbett Avenue, #3. Letter from Graham Bell, requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over Building Permit Application No. 2001/04/27/7889 issued to Michael Majoulet for converting an illegal apartment into storage.

Date issued April 27, 2001

Last day to appeal May 14, 2001

Request for jurisdiction May 31, 2001

ADOPTION OF FINDINGS:

ITEM D: 1299 Quesada Avenue. Appeal No. V01-051. On May 9, 2001, after public hearing, upon motion by President Chin, the Board voted 4-0 (Vice President Saunders absent) to OVERRULE the Zoning Administrator and GRANT the lot size variance to subdivide an existing corner lot into three lots.

ITEM E: 672 and 676 Clipper Street. Appeal 01-048. On May 30, 2001, upon motion by Commissioner Cullum, the Board voted 4-0-1 (President Chin abstained) to OVERRULE the subject determination with FINDINGS prepared by the appellant’s attorney and to be adopted at a later date.

(6)CONSENT ITEMS: With the consent of the Department of Building Inspection, the Board will proceed to a vote without testimony to reduce the penalty (investigation fee) to two times the regular fee as provided for in the Building Code. Without consent the Board will take testimony and then decide the appeal.

(6A)APPEAL NO. 01-072

GEORGE OSUMI, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

[515 John Muir Drive.

[Appeal for Refund of Penalty imposed on [April 24, 2001.

[APPLICATION NO. 2001/04/24/7563.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6B)APPEAL NO. 01-083

ANNA TAM, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[416 -15th Avenue.

[Appeal for Refund of Penalty imposed on [May 16, 2001.

[APPLICATION NO. 2001/04/26/7752.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

Items (7A) through (7D) shall be heard together

(7A)APPEAL NO. 00-258

JOSEF COOPER & TRACY KIRKHAM, Appellants

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[1432-34 Kearny Street.

[Protesting issuance on December 12, 2000, [to Nathan and Nan Roth, permit to Demolish [a Building (garage).

[APPLICATION NO. 2000/09/06/9726.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7B)APPEAL NO. 00-259

JOSEF COOPER & TRACY KIRKHAM, Appellants

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[1432-34 Kearny Street.

[Protesting issuance on December 12, 2000, [to Nathan and Nan Roth, permit to Erect a [Building (three-story two-family dwelling).

[APPLICATION NO. 2000/09/06/9760.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7C)APPEAL NO. 00-260

ALAN KUHN, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[1432-34 Kearny Street.

[Protesting issuance on December 12, 2000, [to Nathan and Nan Roth, permit to Demolish [a Building (garage).

[APPLICATION NO. 2000/09/06/9726.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7D)APPEAL NO. 00-261

ALAN KUHN, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[1432-34 Kearny Street.

[Protesting issuance on December 12, 2000, [to Nathan and Nan Roth, permit to Erect a [Building (three-story two-family dwelling).

[APPLICATION NO. 2000/09/06/9760.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(8) APPEAL NO. 01-035

ROBERT HEYMANN, dba "NATIONAL RENTAL CAR", Appellant

vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[1600 Mission Street.

[Zoning Administrator determination dated [January 23, 2001 that a Police Permit [Application Zoning Referral for a Driverless [Auto Rental business is recommended for [disapproval for failure to meet various [policies and objectives of the Planning Code [and to resolve the issues raised.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9)APPEAL NO. 01-062

CHRISTOPHER SOLLE & CARLTON SOLLE, dba "BUTTER", Appellants

vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[365 - 11th Street.

[Zoning Administrator determination dated [March 22, 2001 disapproving a referral for a [Place of Entertainment/Dance Hall Keeper-[Amendment, and Outdoor Roof/Patio Use in [the Service/Light Industrial/Residential [Mixed Use (SLR) District since under [Planning Code Section 816.37 place of [entertainment uses are not permitted.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10)APPEAL NO. 01-079

LARRY WASSERMAN, Appellant

vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[100-122 - 15th Street.

[Zoning Administrator determination dated [April 20, 2001, addressed to Walter Wong of [Jaidin Consulting Group, on behalf of Larry [Wasserman, the subject property owner, [disapproving the alteration permit for [Epicentric, Inc., the proposed tenant, for the [reason that the business service [determination letter is not transferable from [200 Kansas Street to the occupancy of the [subject property.

[APPLICATION NO. 2001/02/08/1601.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11) APPEAL NO. V01-084

JOHN KING, Appellant

vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[2779 Diamond Street.

[Protesting granting on May 10, 2001 to Jeff [and Julie Blanc, Minimum Lot Size Variance [to subdivide a 2,935 square foot through-lot [into two lots of approximately 1,468 square [feet.

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 2000.937V.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

ADJOURNMENT.

Note: Each item on this agenda may include the following documents:

1. Appellant’s statement and rebuttal brief.

2. Permit holder’s response and rebuttal brief.

3. Department decision, permit, determination or resolution.

4. Public correspondence.

These items are available for review at the Board’s office, 1660 Mission Street, Room 3036, front counter.

Date posted: June 7, 2001