To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body

Meeting Information



2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 

REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF APPEALS

WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2000

5:30 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416

1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE (FORMERLY 301 POLK STREET)

(1) PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting.

(2) COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS.

(3) REQUEST FOR REHEARING: 1050 - 17th Street. Letter from Sue C. Hestor, attorney for Committee for Jobs Arts and Housing, appellant requesting rehearing of Appeal No. 00-119, heard September 6, 2000. Upon motion by Commissioner McInerney, the Board voted 4-0-1 (Commissioner Cullum absent) to GRANT the subject site permit for 19 live/work units.

(4) APPEAL NO. 00-104

JUN WAI CHIN, Appellant

vs.

TAXICAB COMMISSION, Respondent

[Revocation on June 21, 2000, of [Taxicab Medallion #797.

[RESOLUTION NO. 2000-49.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5) APPEAL NO. 00-139

STEVEN F. ECKERSLEY, Appellant

vs.

TAXICAB COMMISSION, Respondent

[Revocation on August 14, 2000, of [Driver Public Vehicle for Hire Permit [#86365.

[RESOLUTION NO. 2000-70.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6) APPEAL NO. 99-085

MARK BORSUK, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL

[1626 Vallejo Street.

[Denial on May 24, 1999, of permit to [Alter a Building (new deck, window and [firewall).

[APPLICATION NO. 9810583.

[PUBLIC HEARING HELD AND [CLOSED JULY 14, 1999.

[FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION [TODAY.

(7) APPEAL NO. 99-035

LUCINDA HAMPTON, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[2234-2236 Francisco Street.

[Protesting issuance on November 12, [1998, to John and Evelyn Schiappaca-[sse, permit to Alter a Building (remove [walls to provide parking spaces and [remove daycare facility).

[APPLICATION NO. 9823286.

[JURISDICTION GRANTED MARCH 18, [1999.

[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.

(8) CONSENT ITEMS: With the consent of the Department of Building Inspection, the Board will proceed to a vote without testimony to reduce the penalty (investigation fee) to two times the regular fee as provided for in the Building Code. Without consent the Board will take testimony and then decide the appeal.

(A) APPEAL NO. 00-140

PETER LARSEN, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[253-263 Laguna Street.

[Imposition of Penalty on August 29, [2000.

[APPLICATION NO. 2000/06/16/2849.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(B) APPEAL NO. 00-149

DANNY CHIN, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[629-631 44th Avenue.

[Imposition of Penalty on August 29, [2000.

[APPLICATION NO. 2000/06/19/2995.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(9) APPEAL NO. 00-077

HIROHIDE & JONIE TAKATSUJI, Appellants

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL

[326 - 18th Avenue.

[Denial on May 9, 2000, of permit to Alter [a Building (construct two-car parking [garage with roof deck at front and [rebuild front stairs).

[APPLICATION NO. 9914207.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

Items (10A) and (10B) shall be heard together

(10A) APPEAL NO. 00-107

PETER G. EUTENEUER, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL

[829 De Haro Street.

[Denial on June 28, 2000, of permit to [Demolish a Building (single-family [dwelling).

[APPLICATION NO. 9907412.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(10B) APPEAL NO. 00-108

PETER G. EUTENEUER, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL

[829 De Haro Street.

[Denial on June 28, 2000, of permit to [Erect a Building (two-unit four-story [dwelling).

[APPLICATION NO. 9907413S.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(11) APPEAL NO. 00-103

TERRANCE ALLAN, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[561 Baker Street.

[Protesting issuance on May 11, 2000, [and suspension June 30, to Robert [Sigmund, permit to Alter a Building [(remove top floor of occupancy to [include bedroom, kitchen, bathrooms; [remove private computer room in [basement; provide one hour fire-rated [door to boiler room; remove obstruction [from rear stair).

[APPLICATION NO. 2000/04/11/6894.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(12) APPEAL NO. 00-131

MARK & LILLIANE BORSUK, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[1624 Vallejo Street.

[Protesting issuance on July 28, 2000, to [Enzo Spaccia, permit to Alter a Building [(alter existing deck per Planning Dept. [rear structure setback requirement).

[APPLICATION NO. 9814775.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(13) APPEAL NO. V00-129

MICHAEL TSANG, Appellant

vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[21 Castenada Avenue.

[Appeal of Condition #1 of Minimum Lot [Size Variance granted on August 7, [2000 (construct a new single-family [dwelling on an approximately 3,400 s.f. lot with the condition that the project [sponsor provide additional sunlight [access to existing windows on the north [wall of 25 Castenada Avenue, via a [matching light well, additional building [set back on the south side, or a step [back on the top floor as good neighbor [gestures).

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 99.645V.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(14) APPEAL NO. V00-130

GLORIA NAJAR & ARMANDO VASQUEZ, Appellants

vs.

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent

[1247 Florida Street.

[Denial of Front Setback Variance (to [allow a new porch and stairs to extend [further into the front setback than the [existing porch).

[VARIANCE CASE NO. 2000.405V.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

ADJOURNMENT.

Note: Each item on this agenda may include the following documents:

1. Appellant’s statement and rebuttal brief.
2. Permit holder’s response and rebuttal brief.
3. Department decision, permit, determination or resolution.
4. Public correspondence.

These items are available for review at the Board’s office, 1660 Mission Street, Room 3036, front counter.