2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF APPEALS
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 1, 2000
5:30 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416
1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE (FORMERLY 301 POLK STREET)
(1) PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting.
- COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS.
(3) CLARIFICATION OF CONDITIONS: Appeal No. 98-212 heard July 14, 1999 for the property at 38 West Clay Street, Rainer and Beatrice Baldauf, appellants, and DeLeys Brandman, permit holder (Application No. 9824371). Board upheld permit on condition the permit holder revise plans to vent the kitchen range on the roof and close up the side wall vent, with appellants to pay 55% of the necessary and reasonable costs up to $5,500.
(4) CONSENT ITEM: With the consent of the Department of Building Inspection, the Board will proceed to a vote without testimony to reduce the penalty (investigation fee) to two times the regular fee as provided for in the Building Code. Without consent the Board will take testimony and then decide the appeal.
(4A) APPEAL NO. 00-020
|
FRANK LEMBI, Appellant
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
|
[Appeal for Refund of Penalty imposed [on January 31, 2000 for work done at [980 Bush Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 9923475.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(5) APPEAL NO. 00-007
|
ESPERANZA ZAVALA & OTTO R. CARDONA, dba "ESPERANZA'S BAR & GRILL", Appellants
vs.
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent
|
[Denial on December 29, 1999, of Billiard [Parlor permit at 80 - 29th Street.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(6) APPEAL NO. 99-051
|
HOC NGUYEN, Appellant
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[Request dated March 29, 1999 for sus- [pension of Building Permit Application [No. 9902213 issued February 2, 1999 [for installation of 22 windows on the [north and west of the building at 700 [Great Highway, for reason the [replacement windows do not comply [with the Design Guidelines for Ocean [Beach Parcel 3 approved as part of [87.081CPCP, Motion No. 11278 of the [Planning Commission.
[FOR FURTHER HEARING TODAY.
|
(7) APPEAL NO. 00-005
|
GEORGE & AMY LUO, Appellants
vs.
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, Respondent
|
[Denial on December 29, 1999, of permit [to Remove and Replace three trees at [2390 - 39th Avenue.
[ORDER NO. 172, 095.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(8) APPEAL NO. 99-184
|
LOUISE BIRD, Appellant
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[Protesting issuance on November 3, [1999, to Farias Outdoor, permit to Paint [a Wall Sign at 146 King Street.
[APPLICATION NO. 9923443.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(9) APPEAL NO. 00-006
|
PATRICIA A. McCOLM, Appellant
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[Protesting issuance on December 30, [1999, to Marc Balistreri, permit to Alter a [Building (excavate basement for eight [foot ceiling; construct new foundation; [construct new bedroom and family room [in basement with bath and laundry; [widen garage door; relocate partitions [for new bedrooms and bath) at 575 [Miramar Avenue.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(10) APPEAL NO. 00-002
|
SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH,
Appellant
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[Determination by the Zoning Admin-[strator dated December 21, 1999 that [Sectorbase.com LLC, a multi-media [business, is a principal permitted use at [2701- 16th Street in the M-1 (Light [Industrial) district since it is a "Business [Service" under Planning Code Section [222 with an off-street parking require-[ment of 18 spaces.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(11) APPEAL NO. 00-008
|
JUDY L. WEST, Appellant
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[Determination by the Zoning Admin-[istrator dated January 5, 2000 that [expansion of the non-complying rear [structure at 321 Potrero Avenue cannot [be approved until a variance from the [rear yard standards for residential [blocks of buildings in M-1 (Light [Industrial) districts has been granted, [and the fact that serious strengthening [and disabled access is being provided [as part of the proposed expansion has [no bearing on this determination.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
ADJOURNMENT.
Note: Each item on this agenda may include the following documents:=
1. Appellant's statement and rebuttal brief.
2. Permit holder's response and rebuttal brief.
3. Department decision, permit, determination or resolution.
4. Public correspondence.
These items are available for review at the Board's office, 1660 Mission Street, Room 3036, front counter.
