To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body

Meeting Information



2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 

BOARD OF APPEALS

REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF APPEALS

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 2000

5:30 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416

1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE (FORMERLY 301 POLK STREET)

 

(1) PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting.

  1. COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS.

(3) MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE:

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTION:

ITEM A: 787 Castro Street. Letter from Jeffrey W. Adams requesting that the Board take jurisdiction over Building Permit Application No. 2000/04/21/7945 issued to Sarah Smith and Greg Smirin for restoration of legal occupancy (remove illegal unit, second kitchen and occupancy separation).

Date issued April 21, 2000

Last day to appeal May 8, 2000

Request for jurisdiction May 26, 2000

ADOPTION OF FINDINGS:

ITEM B: 3015 Washington Street. Appeal 00-029, Elizabeth Collet vs. Department of Building Inspection, Planning Department disapproval. Hearing May 17, 2000. Upon motion by Commissioner McInerney, the Board voted 4-0 (Vice President Saunders absent) to OVERRULE the Planning Department and GRANT the permit on CONDITION that the deck be pulled back six inches, with Section 311 and Prop M FINDINGS from the Planning staff report which were incorporated by reference.

Items (4A) and (4B) shall be heard together

(4A) APPEAL NO. 00-065

BOSQUE & SMITH, LLC, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL

[993 Tennessee Street.

[Denial on April 13, 2000, of permit to [Demolish a Building (plumbing storage [shed).

[APPLICATION NO. 9826501.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(4B) APPEAL NO. 00-066

BOSQUE & SMITH, LLC, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL

[993 Tennessee Street.

[Denial on April 13, 2000, of permit to [Erect a Building (10 live/work units).

[APPLICATION NO. 9826500S.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

 

Items (5A) and (5B) and (5C) shall be heard together

(5A) APPEAL NO. 00-067

NATHALIE M. WONG, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

[768 El Camino Del Mar.

[Protesting issuance on April 14, 2000, to [Barry and Lizanne Rosenstein, permit to [Alter a Building (remove front fence; [remove backfill against failing retaining [wall at rear yard).

[APPLICATION NO. 2000/04/14/7245.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5B) APPEAL NO. 00-068

NATHALIE M. WONG, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

[768 El Camino Del Mar.

[Protesting issuance on April 17, 2000, to [Barry and Lizanne Rosenstein, permit to [Alter a Building (remove fence/wall from [perimeter of property).

[APPLICATION NO. 2000/04/17/7403.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(5C) APPEAL NO. 00-081

NATHALIE M. WONG, Appellant

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[768 El Camino Del Mar.

[Protesting issuance on May 15, 2000, to [Barry & Lizanne Rosenstein, permit to [Alter a Building (extensive interior [remodeling to both floors and basement, [relocating of garage, and horizontal [extension to basement, first and second [floors).

[APPLICATION NO. 9920588S.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(6) APPEAL NO. 00-075

QIONG XIAN MAI, et al., Appellants

vs.

DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent

PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL

[75B and 75 Lynch Street.

[Protesting issuance on May 4, 2000, to [James Byrne, permit to Alter a Building [(remove two illegal units in basement [and convert to storage space only).

[APPLICATION NO. 2000/05/04/9072.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

Items ( 7A) and (7B) shall be heard together

(7A) APPEAL NO. 00-078

JOHN K. SMITH, Appellant

vs.

PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent

[535 Mission Street.

[Appeal of Condition 3A(4) based on [Finding 6A of Planning Commission [Motion 15,026 adopted April 13, 2000 [requiring the project sponsor of the 24-[story office building project to pursue [with due diligence the required City [approvals for closure of Shaw Alley from [11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Monday through [Friday as part of its open space [requirement.

[CASE NO. 1998.766X.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

(7B) APPEAL NO. 00-079

JOHN K. SMITH, Appellant

vs.

PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent

[535 Mission Street.

[Appeal of findings and conditions set [forth in Planning Commission Motion [15,027 authorizing a 24-story office [building and incorporating by reference [all findings and conditions of Motion [15,026 requiring the project sponsor to [pursue with due diligence all required [City approvals for closure of Shaw Alley [from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Monday [through Friday as part of its open space [requirement.

[CASE NO. 1998.766B.

[FOR HEARING TODAY.

 

ADJOURNMENT.

Note: Each item on this agenda may include the following documents:

1. Appellant’s statement and rebuttal brief.

2. Permit holder’s response and rebuttal brief.

3. Department decision, permit, determination or resolution.

4. Public correspondence.

These items are available for review at the Board’s office, 1660 Mission Street, Room 3036, front counter.