2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF APPEALS
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2000
5:30 P.M., CITY HALL, ROOM 416
1 DR. CARLTON B. GOODLETT PLACE (FORMERLY 301 POLK STREET)
(1) PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, members of the public may address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Board will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting with one exception. When the agenda item has already been reviewed in a public hearing at which members of the public were allowed to testify and the Board has closed the public hearing, your opportunity to address the Board must be exercised during the Public Comment portion of the calendar. Each member of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. If it is demonstrated that comments by the public will exceed 15 minutes, the President may continue Public Comment to another time during the meeting.
- COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS.
(3) APPEAL NO. 00-074
|
EDUARDO TROZ, Appellant
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL
|
[1363 Palou Avenue.
[Denial on May 1, 2000, of permit to Alter [a Building (two-story horizontal addi-[tion).
[APPLICATION NO. 9922806S.
[PUBLIC HEARING HELD AND [CLOSED JULY 26, 2000.
[FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION [TODAY.
|
(4) APPEAL NO. 00-118
|
ELMER OWENS, et al., Appellants
vs.
DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVAL
|
[3065 Clay Street.
[Denial on July 21, 2000, of permit to [Alter a Building (remove occupancy [stipulation on CFC 7804653).
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/09/08/9983.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(5) APPEAL NO. 00-099
|
PAUL WEBER & EVELYN MACIAS, Appellants
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[4390 – 26TH Street.
[Protesting issuance on June 13, 2000, [to Sun-Choy Wong, permit to Alter a [Building (one-story vertical addition and [minor alterations in existing building per [plans).
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/02/23/2537.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(6) APPEAL NO. 00-102
|
PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF DIVISADERO ST., Appellant
vs.
DEPT. OF BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[537 Divisadero Street.
[Protesting issuance on June 21, 2000, [to Howard A. Cooper, permit to Alter a [Building (install new awning).
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/06/21/3277.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(7) APPEAL NO. 00-120
|
KENNETH SCUDDER & KELLIN DEFIEL, Appellants
vs.
DEPT. BUILDING INSPECTION, Respondent
PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
|
[310 Green Street.
[Protesting issuance on July 11, 2000, to [Mitch Menaged, permit to Demolish a [Building (single family dwelling).
[APPLICATION NO. 9915173.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(8) APPEAL NO. 00-113
|
MICHAEL T. EGE, PAMELA I. UBERTI & ADAM SUMINSKI, Appellants
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[2215 Powell Street.
[Zoning Administrator determination [dated June 29, 2000, that the extension [of the Conditional Use Authorization [dated November 27, 1996 (Case No. [91.373C) for a full service restaurant [and bar has not been abandoned and is [still valid provided all renovations are [complete and a final Certificate of [Occupancy is obtained and the [establishment reopened within six [months of the ABC’s ruling, otherwise a [new CU application must be submitted.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(9) APPEAL NO. 00-114
|
RICHARD GARCIA, Appellant
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[2258 Beach Street.
[Zoning Administrator determination [dated June 29, 2000 that a second [kitchen can be installed in the one-[family house only as part of a second [unit and, with the current parking [configuration in the garage, only if an [off-street parking variance is sought and [granted by the Zoning Administrator.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(10) APPEAL NO. 00-124
|
RICHARD GARCIA, Appellant
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[2258 Beach Street.
[Zoning Administrator determination [dated July 19, 2000 that the proposed [greenhouse on the existing rear deck [cannot be approved without additional [accurate drawings and a site plan, [notification under Planning Code [Section 311, submittal of a copy of the [approved permit application and [drawings for the existing lower deck, [and the five foot setback on each side [of the greenhouse must be open to the [sky requiring relocation of the existing [stair and landing.
[APPLICATION NO. 2000/04/25/8211.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
(11) APPEAL NO. 00-093
|
SAN FRANCISCANS FOR REASONABLE GROWTH, Appellant
vs.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Respondent
|
[250 Brannan Street.
[Zoning Administrator’s determination [dated June 7, 2000 that the use classi-[fication of DoubleClick, Inc., an Internet [company specializing in development of [software solutions for Internet publishers [and advertisers which intends to operate [in a Service/Secondary Office (SSO) [zoning district, is a Business Service [under Planning Code Section 890.11 [and is exempt from Section 321 [requirements, and is a permitted use in [the SSO district.
[FOR HEARING TODAY.
|
ADJOURNMENT.
Note: Each item on this agenda may include the following documents:
1. Appellant’s statement and rebuttal brief.
2. Permit holder’s response and rebuttal brief.
3. Department decision, permit, determination or resolution.
4. Public correspondence.
These items are available for review at the Board’s office, 1660 Mission Street, Room 3036, front counter.
