2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
COMMISSION ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN
City and County of San Francisco
MINUTES
Regular Meeting
Wednesday, December 13, 2000 at 5:00
P.M.
City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett
Place, Room 400
San Francisco, California 94102
American Sign Language interpreters and
a Sound Amplification System provided upon request with 48-hour advance
notice to 415-252-2570. Limited accessible street parking available. Accessible
MUNI Lines are the 15, 44, 23 and 24 lines. Accessible seating for persons
with disabilities (including those using wheelchairs) will be available.
Meeting proceedings available in alternative formats. In order to assist
the City’s efforts to accommodate persons with severe allergies, environmental
illness, multiple chemical sensitivity or related disabilities, attendees
at public meetings are reminded that other attendees may be sensitive to
various chemical based products. Please help the City to accommodate these
individuals. To make arrangements or for accessibility information, contact
Susan Murphy at 415-252-2570 (Voice) or 415-252-2550 (TDD).
MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT
President Juanita Miles Sonia Melara
Vice President Carolene Marks Latika Malkani
Commissioner Dorka Keehn Susan Murphy
Commissioner Emily Murase Rosario Navarrette
Commissioner Andrea Shorter Carol Sacco
1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
President Miles called to order at 5:05 p.m.
(Commissioner Murase arrived at 5:12 p.m.)
2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
m/s/c (Marks, Murase, Unanimous) To adopt the agenda
for Wednesday, December 13, 2000.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
m/s/c (Marks, Keehn, Unanimous) To approve the minutes
of the Regular Meeting held Wednesday, November 15, 2000.
m/s/c (Marks, Keehn, Unanimous) To approve the minutes
of the Annual Retreat Meeting held Saturday, October 14, 2000 with the amendment
to change Valarie Tulier’s title from Commissioner to Ms.
4. PRESIDENT’S REPORT
5. STAFF REPORT
Ms. Melara pointed out that a full written report was included
in the Commissioner’s packet written by Rosario Navarrette, Assistant Director.
Ms. Navarrette spoke briefly on the following:
· Initial research was done regarding what work the
Department of the Environment and other community organizations were doing
for the Bayview Hunter’s Point community (Position papers and findings of
research done on the hazardous waste are available for copying at the office).
President Miles specifically requested that she receive a map of the hazardous
waste sites located through out Bayview Hunters Point.
· New Staff Person (Introduction to the Commissioners)
Winnie Xie spoke to the Commissioners regarding her
background. Ms. Melara commented the Ms. Xie’s has strong contracts knowledge.
The Commissioners welcomed her.
President Miles acknowledged Ms. Navarette for stepping
in as Acting Executive Director during Ms. Sonia Melara’s leave. President Miles
stated that they appreciated and thanked Ms. Navarrette.
6. NEW BUSINESS
President Miles asked if any Commissioner wished to serve
as liaison to the Friends of the Commission. Former Commissioner Tulier was
the Commission’s representative and at this point there is no representation.
Commissioner Marks stated she was very interested; however, her time is limited
and she would not be available till a later date. President Miles stated that
she would be willing to meet with Commissioner Marks to bring her up to date
and examine what the process steps would be.
Ms. Melara stated that a contributing factor in the Friends
lack of activity is that there is no staff person. If one of the Commissioners
were to provide the leadership in developing active membership for the board,
the staff person could perform the necessary follow-up. The position is currently
open for a part-timer. (e.g. student, retired person) This person would spend
approximately 20 hours a week doing work related to the Friends such as the
newsletter. A $1,000 a month has been allocated for the position.
President Miles requested that the President of the Friends,
MaryAnn O’Shea, be asked to attend the next Commission meeting so that the
status of the Friends can be discussed.
7. OLD BUSINESS
a) ADOPTION OF THREE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN (see attached)
m/s/c (Shorter, Keehn, Unanimous) To adopt the Three
Year Strategic Plan with the following amendments:
· Page 3, paragraph 2, second sentence change such
as; to such as:
· Page 3, paragraph 4, last sentence change Commissioners
roles, responsibilities to Commissioners and Department roles, responsibilities
· Page 3, under Objectives, add the following language:
- Continue
citywide work/life survey and implementation of resulting recommendations
in FY 2001-2004.
- Continue
Public Awareness Campaign, including media work and presentations, in
FY 2001-2004.
- Develop
a transition plan for the CEDAW Task Force in FY 2001-2002.
● Page 4, 2nd bullet, change June
30, 2002 to December 31, 2002
● Page 5, 2nd Objective, 1st
bullet - delete Also, produce a yearly report.
● Page 5, 2nd Objective, 2nd
bullet - change Collect and analyze statistical information on discrimination
complaint cases and produce a yearly report to Collect and analyze
statistical information as provided by the Human Resources Department and
report to the Commission.
a) In the Three Year Strategic Plan under Violence
Against Women a Needs Assessment was completed December 2000.
The consultants, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Ph.D. (Access Social
Knowledge) and Seline Szkupinski Quiroga (Culture Cures Consulting) presented
the final report of the Needs Assessment for Violence Against Women (VAW)
services for the city of San Francisco for adoption into the final plan.
Commissioners requested the Needs Assessment to determine the needs of past,
present and future clients in VAW services and to identify gaps and barriers
that exist. They accomplished that goal by gathering data both qualitative
and quantitative from agencies and service providers, women who had experienced
violence, community members and female residents of S.F. using a variety
of methods. They identified a number of priority populations (women/girls
who were underserved or at increase risk of violence). The needs and barriers
specific to each particular group is detailed in the full report as well
as recommendations.
As a result of their research they have recommendations
on two levels: 1) specific to priority populations and, 2) general recommendations.
They are all discussed in the full report.
The Commissioners discussed the report and recommendations,
asked questions of the consultants which they answered.
The VAW Needs Assessment was adopted as part of the
Three Year Strategic Plan.
b) ADOPTION OF THE COSW MEETING SCHEDULE (see attached)
m/s/c (Murase/Keehn/Unanimous) To adopt the COSW
Meeting Schedule with the following amendments:
Date Location Topic
January 24,2001 Room 408 (City Hall) Environmental
Health
March 28 Neighborhood Meeting Environmental Health
June 27 Neighborhood Meeting Language Issues
September 26 Neighborhood Meeting Homelessness
November 28 Neighborhood Meeting Elderly
Commissioner Marks had concerns regarding the lack
of turn-out of community members at the neighborhood meetings and questioned
what steps could be taken that would result in a bigger turn out. For
the Bayview meeting President Miles suggested that this would be a good
time for us to introduce the Commission/Department to the new Supervisor,
Sophie Maxwell, since she is the Supervisor for that district. Commissioner
Marks also suggested that we get a complete listing of organizations for
all the other various neighborhoods where we will be expecting to meet.
Ms. Melara suggested that now since the Supervisors
are representing districts that we invite them to attend when we have
meetings in their particular district. She also indicated that the list
we use to invite community organizations is the same data base used for
the social services directory and requested Commissioners to review the
directory and provide information on any missing organizations.
It was also suggested that we hold a function for
the Supervisors who will be leaving office and welcome those newly elected.
c) Status of Domestic Violence Investigation
Commissioner Keehn had concerns regarding funding due
to the fact that Supervisor Yaki was not re-elected into office and he was
obtaining the funding for the investigation
Ms. Navarrette stated that she had sent a message to
Supervisor Yaki’s office informing him that he still has the option to be
involved as an individual. We asked his assistant to inform us who they
would be approaching to spear head the budgetary portion of the investigation.
The Department will inform the Commissioners as soon as we know.
An initial meeting was held before Thanksgiving and
disccused who might be on the review panel and our approach to the investigation.
Ideas were discussed as to how to approach the various Departments to ensure
full disclosure in order to identify and improve the City’s response to
domestic violence. One way is to have the City Attorney’s Office Investigators
do the investigation with the City Departments to allow us the level of
confidentiality that may be needed to ensure full cooperation and drive
the process. This would be through an inter-department work order. The City
Attorney’s Office Investigators would be working with the Department’s staff.
To clarity, this is a City investigation. There are
two levels of the investigation: 1) City Attorney’s Office Investigator
do the preliminary investigation with the City Departments; and 2) Public
hearing providing community and individuals a forum for voicing their opinions
and make recommendations.
We have been informed that some community organizations
and the Tempongko family may be conducting their own independent investigation
as well.
8. PUBLIC COMMENT
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS
Commissioner Murase indicated that as requested before
she would prefer the Commissioners not have a copy of anything in their meeting
packet that was mailed to them previously (duplication).
She also requested that the Commissioners receive an updated
staff/commissioner roster list.
10. ADJOURNMENT
President Miles called for the meeting to adjourn at 6:19
p.m.
Know Your Rights under the Sunshine
Ordinance
(Chapter 67 of the San Francisco Administrative Code)
Government’s duty is to serve the public, reaching
its decision in full view of the public. Commissions, boards, councils and other
agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people’s business. This
ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that
City operations are open to the people’s review. For more information on your
rights under the Sunshine Ordinance, or to report a violation of the Ordinance,
contact the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force at 415-554-4851. To obtain a free
copy of the Sunshine Ordinance contact the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, Rachel
Arnstine O’Hara, Clerk, City Hall, Room 362, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place,
San Francisco, CA 94102-4683, phone: 415-554-6171, fax: 415-554-6177, email:
rachel_arnstineo’hara@ci.sf.ca.us. Copies of the Sunshine Ordinance can also
be obtained from the San Francisco Public Library and on the City’s website
at www.sfgov.org. To review or obtain documents referred to on agenda, contact
Susan Murphy at 25 Van Ness Ave, Room 130, San Francisco, CA 94102; phone: 415-252-2570,
fax: 415-252-2575.
Attention: Individuals and entities that influence
or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required
by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance (SF Admin Code 16.520 - 16.534) to register
and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance,
please contact the Ethics Commission at 1390 Market Street #701, San Francisco,
CA 94102, telephone 415-554-9510, fax 415-703-0121 and web site http://sfgov.org/ethics.