(DISCUSSION/ACTION) City Attorney’s review of protocols, procedures, roles and responsibilities of the Commission, in regards to:
· conducting commission meetings
· Interaction with the Chief Probation Officer and the probation dept
· |nternal and external communications
· Roles and relationships with external govt and non govt agencies.
Main points presented in this discussion were that all regulations governing the conduct (scheduling) of meetings were prescribed by Brown and Sunshine. There are ways to establish “regular” meetings off site of city hall, where a 72 hr advance notice will suffice, otherwise, they would have to be noted 15 days advance. Possibly have to set up a master schedule of meetings as part of the Commission’s annual plan.
Carillo commented on the authority of the commission to set policy vs being able to direct and undertake actions of the Dept. He mentioned the question of the City’s liability if actions of the Dept’s staff were or were not directly the result of policy decisions made by the Commission.
Number of commissioners able to attend the same meeting is also governed by Brown and Sunshine, so different thoughts about which particular commissioners could/would attend meetings in the community (called by others) was discussed.
No more than 3 at a time, with no more than 1 from the same committee can be at the same meeting. Likewise, discussion between commissioners regarding commission/dept business, cannot be held in a series where a majority manage to carry out discussion, outside of a publicly noted meeting. Ad Hoc committees can be created to do specific things like “fact finding”.
Communications and directions to the Dept for action can only be addressed to the Chief. But perhaps to have division directors be part of commission committee meetings so that any information needed by the Commission can be brought to the commission via that procedure.
The official spokesperson for the Commission is the President (in the commission’s rules). Only official positions/actions of the commission can be represented by the President.. while any commissioner can express their own personal opinions, these need to be clearly differentiated from the commission’s official positions.
D. Carillo will further research the legal relationships between the commission and external bodies (govt especially) and report back. And also what potential restrictions or proscriptions may exist that prohibit Commission members from attending meetings in the community, representing the Commission.
This question grew out of recent events where the roles and responsibilities of the Commission seemed to be sidestepped or overruled by other entities, leaving confusion and uncomfortable feelings among affected individuals. Re: the LCRS committee, Carillo said he believed Amy Ackerman is the person from his office, involved in this topic.
(public comments)
|