To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body

Meeting Information



Programs_Committee

2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 

MINUTES OF MARCH 25, 2003 PROGRAM COMMITTEE MEETING of the JUVENILE PROBATION COMMISSION

held at Youth Guidance Center Rm 328  375 Woodside Ave San Francisco, CA  94127

The Minutes of this meeting set forth all actions taken by the Commission on the matters stated, but not necessarily the chronological sequence in which the matters were taken up

1.

(ACTION)  Roll Call

The meeting was called to order at 6:34 pm.  All commissioners were present at the gavel.  L. Holmes, S. Arcelona, J. Knox were representing the Dept.

2.

(ACTION) Review and approval of  January 21, 2003 meeting minutes 

The minutes were approved as written.

(public comments)

There was none.

 

3.

Public comment on any matter within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Juvenile Probation Commission

There was none.

4.

(DISCUSSION)  Report from Bayview Hunters Point and Western Addition community based contractors on status of their operations.

Comm. Richard said that he was asking all CBOs to report on how things were going so that the Committee would have a better idea of what situation the Dept faced, as far as how money was being expended and what was being accomplished with those funds. He announced that City Hall was now asking for even more cuts in the budget so it would behoove all to be alert.

      a.    Bayview is BVHP Foundation   (not present)

        b.  SLUG

Hector Garam, Human Resources Manager/Youth Manager for Programs, reviewed some of the projects running, and some of the problems in the funding landscape.

S. Arcelona reported that SLUG is turning around some of the problems of the past.  Currently the crews around YGC are under capacity, but hopefully more youth will be referred to them.

        c.  Office of Samoan Affairs  (not present)

       d.  The Beacon Center

K. Celoni gave a short report.  They work with younger, and some older at risk kids.  Many of them come from the elementary school on the next block.  They do case management to keep them from entering the juvenile justice system.  Barbara Cohen, the Director, reported. A major concern for them is that parental involvement or concern with their kids is lacking.  She characterized it as apathetic.  She asked if there was any way to encourage/require parent involvement in the case management program, as a probation condition of the youth. She said their case managers go to the schools and into the classrooms to “check up” on their youth, and the teachers have expressed   She also said that in the Western Addition they have not been able to identify many of the youth on probation.

S. Arcelona stated that the funding from the Dept supports the case managers at certain Beacons, which is a very important resource to identifying early on potential problems, and addressing them. Comm. Dupre asked the Dept staff to look into whether probation officers can mandate parents participate, for each youth referred to the Beacon Ctr.

Comm Bonilla said that even in these tight financial times, it may be useful to have an outreach program that talks to parents about how the Dept is interested not only in working with youth when they come to the dept, but also in ways to prevent that connection.

Comm Dupre asked if the Bayview Beacon Ctr was requested to report tonight.  Ans:  yes.

Comm. Bonilla asked the Dept to send a letter to those CBOs who were absent tonight, to come report at the next meeting.

Comm. Dupre commended those CBOs present for their continuing good work.

        e.  Girls After School Academy  (not asked to come, CBO in Sunnydale)

         f.  Ella Hill Hutch Community Center

The program is at full capacity, with 1.25 FTE staff.  With the cuts they probably will cut the ¼ position. The caseload now is about 25, 5 of those being carried by the .25FTE staff.  The Committee expressed a concern for the services to girls if they cut the .25 FTE staff, who is female.  They said they will supplement the services of this program with their other services. They will look for other funding to keep the program going. 

Lonnie Holmes stated that the contractor was doing well and meeting all program objectives.

        g.  Morrisania West

Kim Celoni, Case Manager, reviewed their operations. She carries a caseload of about 13, providing many supportive services for her clients.  She said that cuts in the funding will reduce the number of cases she can serve, but they will not turn away clients from getting help.  She mentioned her colleague, Cortes Espinosa, had broken his leg and wasn’t able to attend.

Comm. Bonilla asked if funding from the Dept were ultimately terminated, would that mean that they would continue those services gratis?  Ans: yes.  Comm. Bonilla said that showed the level of commitment CBOs had toward their clients.  Comm. Dupre wanted the CBO to state whether this was going to be at a sacrfice.  Ans: yes. 

Lonnie Homes  confirmed their report.

Sheila Arcelona reported that C. Espinosa’s position is supported through TANF.

         h.  YWCA Girls Mentorship Program (not present)

         i.   Special Services for Groups

Colleen Devine reported that they were doing well, serving about 50 people, with their curriculum        integrated into Ida B Wells school’s curriculum.  They have been able to develop good relationships with other services (CBOs and institutions) to which they can refer their clients.  About 65% of their clients get employment (and keep it an avg of 3 mos) after they finish the program.  About 30% go further to enter college. They were able to leverage their TANF grant to get other funding and expand their services.  S. Arcelona said that they have been very successful in getting additional help from interns to extend their services.

(public comments)

Ntanya Lee expressed her continued disappointment with how money is spent in the city (eg. SF police), when the need for community programs is critical.    She said that other depts. who have such funds need to devote some of those funds to this Dept to continue community programs

 

5.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(DISCUSSION)  PrIDE report on the Girls 2000 project, and TANF highlights/overview.

Andrew Robinson and Sarah Berango of LaFrance Associates reported: she reviewed a brief description of what Girls 2000 does under this grant.  The report is basically a participant profile of their clientele. There is some outcome data.  Some of the data in the report comes from intake and discharge instruments created by American Justice Institute.  JJIS data and service satisfaction surveys provided additional information. (the complete report is available through the JPD Community Programs Division)

Takai Tyler; Director of Girls 2000 summarized further what they have been doing. They served approx. 45 girls.  The family services program has 20 girls.  The sample size for this report was 15. 

Comm Bonilla commented that he’s only heard positive remarks about the organization, in the community.

Comm. Dupre asked if the organization has found other funding for its operation, given the status of TANF.  Ans: they are continuously looking.

Andrew Robinson said that for the TANF highlights report, they were able to abstract data from 10 of the 11 TANF programs that participated in the PrIDE system (15 TANF funded programs).  One of those eleven had no data (Bayview Hunters Point Foundation).  [The entire report is available from the JPD Community Programs Div].

Comm. Bonilla asked why there was no data for the BVHP Fdn.  LFA didn’t know.  Maybe they were told they didn’t have to. S. Arcelona said that there wasn’t a monitor for that program, but she was interested in finding out why there wasn’t any data also.

Ques: what was the cause of the disparity between guy/girl with regards to employment, pre and post. 

S. Arcelona didn’t have an explanation for that fact, but said having this fact revealed is one important aspect of having aggregate information about the programs and clients.

Comm. Dupre asked what kind of jobs were typical of those gotten by the clients.  S. Arcelona said that more than not, they were MYEEP jobs, with support services given.

Comm. Dupre asked that information on BVHP Fdn be given at the next committee meeting, and also if possible, PIC and MYEEP stats.  His own experience in MYEEP was that more girls than boys had jobs. 

(public comments)

There was none.

 

(DISCUSSION)  Edgewood Children’s Center evaluation/presentation

Ken Epstein, Director of Programs, Teresa Reys, coordinator of the TANF funded program; They have been doing an evaluation of their programs since 1993.  There are many aspects to their program, working with and supporting the caregivers (22 homes).  21 of those 22 youth are still living with their caregivers.  Their funds have leveraged other support coming to the agency.  S. Arcelona said that this was a very challenging program, with so many needs of the population, and this led to some infrastructure problems before. But now with stable staff, it is going well.

(public comments)

There was none.

(DISCUSSION)  Update on the Gang Free Communities Initiative (D. Mauroff)

D. Mauroff wasn’t present to give an update. It was speculated that he was busy with many recent events in the Mission district, and would have to give his report at the next Committee meeting.

(public comments) 

There was none.

 

8.

(DISCUSSION)  Update on the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (G. Bierenger)

G. Bierenger summarized all the different work being done through its 5 committees.  He handed out a written report of this.  One of the more significant accomplishments to date is the new intake assessment instrument for JH.  This will lead to much improved data and better understanding of how the system is working and can be further improved. One fact that was surprising is that while the number of admissions to JH have fallen, the number of days stay in JH have increased. (the report is available from G. Bierenger)   G. Bierenger reported that next week, JDAI projects will be gathering in SJ. After that meeting, he will report back on how the initiative seems to be working nationwide.

(public comments)

There was none

9.

Public comment on any matter within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Juvenile Probation Commission

Comm. Dupre thanked everyone for coming and making their reports.  S. Arcelona said that there is yet no answer about TANF continuing.

10.

(ACTION) Adjournment

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:25pm.