Programs_Committee
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 MINUTES OF MARCH 16, 2005 MEETING of the PROGRAM COMMITTEE Of the JUVENILE PROBATION COMMISSION
held at Youth Guidance Center conference room 375 Woodside Ave. San Francisco, CA 94127
The Minutes of this meeting set forth all actions taken by the Commission on the matters
stated, but not necessarily the chronological sequence in which the matters were taken up
1.
|
(ACTION) Roll Call
Comm Queen called the meeting to order at 5:17pm. Comm Chuck was present at the gavel. Comm. Stiglich was excused. Bill Sifferman, Liz Jackson-Simpson, Steve La France, Valerie Salazar, Rudy Corpus, Roberto Vargas, Lonnie Holmes, Ron Stickles, Kwanza Morton, Omar Khalif, Don Sanders, Bill Johnston were in attendance.
|
2.
|
(ACTION) Review and approval of Minutes of February 16, 2005 meeting.
Upon motion and seconded, the minutes were approved as written.
(public comment)
there were none.
|
3.
|
Public Comment on any matter within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Program Committee of the Juvenile Probation Commission.
Rich Perino raised the question of whether it would be more cost effective to allow Larkin St. Youth Center deal with some or all of the clients that Huckleberry Youth Services uses half a million to do. He asked if someone could be directed to look into this.
He also brought up the issue of contracting with CBOs at a cost sometimes higher than having city employees do the work (which he said is in conflict with the City Charter). He specifically referred to the cost of letting PO’s to the work, which is subsidized by Title IVe. The net cost is about $10/hr to the City. He doesn’t believe this can be beat by community contracting. He asked the Commission to examine the contracts with this fact in mind, vis a vis the charter section that relates to it. He said the union might be pushed to taking action in this regards. Comm Queen asked him to put this request in writing.
Comm Queen also mentioned that Comm Rodriguez wanted to have more interaction between Dept staff and the Commission, and wanted to explore some ways of setting up meetings that would allow that to happen.
|
4.
|
|
5.
|
|
6.
|
|
7.
|
|