planning
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Notes: August 6th, 2007Sustainability Discussion, SF Asthma Task Force
Process ATF activity re: Objectives
Committees?
ATF again?
Timeline
Interviews
Planning for Fall discussions
Planning for Monday
Does the group feel like ARC should take
Scenarios:
2 Options:
1. Legislated
Capacity & Realistic Roles
ARC, Inc. – funnel smaller amounts of funding, host clinical projects
Breathe California – experience as fiscal agent, funnel large amounts of money, host schools & child care projects
DPH –
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legislated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Coalition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Perks:
Overall Challenges:
Parking Lot/Future Questions:
Objective: Flush out scenarios and
Phase 2: WHAT - Projects to continue:
Phase 3: HOW - Philosophy/Strategy/Approach: Community mobilization,
What it takes to make ATF function:
1.5 -2.0 FTE salary, benefits, overhead
$150K no matter what just for staff – who will fundraise? AN/SM, BC, ATF, Planning Committee
What is it going to take to bring that money in?
What if no more CAFA?
BC fundraising can contribute to ATF?
ARC, Inc. projects
2. Autonomous community coalition
BC fiscal agent
[3. ARC, Inc. function as a program/partner of Breathe CA???]
AGENDA
Facilitator: Kate Lorenzen
Introductions
Highlights from last meeting (Anjali/Stephanie)
Purpose of today’s meeting
Scenario Development
Next Steps – aim for September meeting – sharing of interview feedback, voting on scenarios to pursue
Next Meeting – how to use Planning meetings
Flush out scenarios
What to consider in each 2 scenarios:
Funding, structure, location, governance, staffing, admin and oversight (fiscal sponsor), overall perks, overall challenges
If BC fundraises we have the right to
Planning:
