To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body

Meeting Information



Elections Commission

2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 

City and County of San Francisco
Elections Commission

(Approved: 11/20/02)

Minutes of the Meeting held
October 23, 2002

1. President Mendelson called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.

2. COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioner Robert Kenealey, Commissioner Brenda Stowers, Commissioner Richard Shadoian, Vice President Alix Rosenthal, President Michael Mendelson.

    ABSENT: Commissioner Thomas Schulz.

3. FLAG SALUTE

4. PUBLIC COMMENT. None.

5. President Mendelson stated that there was no need to confer with counsel and therefore there would be no closed session.

6. MOTION to approve the Elections Commission Minutes for the meeting held October 2, 2002. Commissioner Rosenthal moved to approve the minutes, Commissioner Shadoian seconded. PASSED.

    Public Comment. None.

7. Officer's Reports

    President Mendelson gave a report of the restructuring of the Department of Elections. The complete report is attached as an addendum #1 to these minutes.

8. Committee Reports

    Commissioner Brenda Stowers reported that the Budget and Policy Committee met at 5:30 pm today. A motion was made at that meeting to recommend to the full Commission that it adopt a Notification Policy but there was no second and the motion died. There was no motion to recommend a policy for zero tolerance regarding Voter Fraud. This means that neither policy made it out of the committee.

9. Director's Report

    Voter Services Division - to date, 1200 voters have come to the early voting counter. This is higher than the very low voter turn out in March. 16,000 absentee voter applications have been received, 700 remain to be processed. 14,000 registration cards have come in since the last Commission meeting - this is a high rate. These people are changing information or are new voters. Monday, October 21 was the deadline for voter registration.

    Campaign Services Division - The observer guide is completed. This guide describes all the processes for an election such as how the absentee ballots are handled, the tabulation of votes that come into the computer room on election night, etc. The campaign services phone bank has been busy. We delivered over 440,000 voter information pamphlets (VIPs) to the Post Office beginning September 29 and ending on October 10. The Post Office advises that there are still routes to which the carriers have not delivered the pamphlets. These VIPs are so large, the carriers see them as catalogs - not time sensitive documents. The Post Office has been very supportive and has been regularly checking the various stations to see if the VIPs have gone out.

    Next Wednesday, Campaign Services will hold an Open House. The public will be able to participate in guided tours of the department. The DOE has put out notices inviting people to attend. Eighteen members of the Grand Jury are expected to observe the election process this time, this is more than in previous elections, and they will be able to go wherever they want. But like all observers, they cannot touch ballots or rosters or ask questions of the staff. They will be able to speak to supervisors, but cannot interfere with the work of staff.

    Election Support Services Division - There has been some turnover in the ranks of the poll workers, however, we have more than the sufficient numbers of clerks. 2700 poll workers have signed up and have been scheduled for classes. Two more inspectors are needed at the present time.

    Management of Information Systems (MIS) - The logic and accuracy testing - where we test the vote counting systems - is complete. The report has been sent to the Secretary of State and they have certified it.

    Purchasing - We are working to see that all of our purchases, contracts and invoices meet City standards. This is a learning process and we are working with everyone who is knowledgeable in this process to make sure we are compliant.

    Personnel - The Election Day and Evening personnel list is complete. We know where people will be and what they will be doing and at what times. We will be putting together a post election personnel list on Friday which should be completed next week. In addition, we are preparing for the time when we will need to release many of the employees. There is always a lot of paper work involved in this activity. We have 134 part time people compared to March when the number was 250. The 250 did include 100 Field Election Deputies (FEDs). This time we have 50 FEDs included in the 134 employees for this upcoming election.

    Preparation for the November 5, 2002 - The ballots have been put together for the Inspectors to pick up beginning next weekend. Each polling place will receive four boxes of cards because there are four cards to the ballot this time. We've executed the plan and now is the time to hand things over to the poll workers. The planning with the Sheriffs is nearly complete. We have a few items such as communication protocols to hammer out, but personnel and logistics are complete.

    Francee Covington held a Media Day yesterday in City Hall. Fourteen media representatives stopped by as well as City Hall communications staff to make sure the media had the tools necessary for reporting election night. I want to commend her for the best organized Media Day we've ever had.

    Commissioner Kenealey asked the Director if the Commissioners would need special identification to be able to observe the election day activities. Director Arntz replied that special cards would be provided to the Commissioners.

    Commissioner Shadoian asked the Director to explain the Election Observer Panel. Director Arntz reported that the panel is being put together. Notices have been sent out to political organizations and media. We are one of only a few of the counties in the State to have such a panel.

    Commissioner Shadoian asked the Director about the Secretary of State's report. Director Arntz stated that he had sent it today and will provide copies to the Commissioners. Commissioner Shadoain also requested a copy of the previous report. The Director said he would provide this as well.

Public Comment

    Peter Fries said that a motion should be put forward for action and discussion and after the commission makes its comments the public is invited to make comments and then the vote is taken.

9. Unfinished Business - None

10. New Business -

    Commissioner Rosenthal stated that she had a copy of the organizational chart of the Department of Elections and that she wanted to make sure that there was the same chart available to the public attending this meeting. The Commission Secretary responded that copies had been made available on the public information table. The Commissioner then MOVED that the Commission adopt the Organizational Chart as its general elections department structure. Commissioner Kenealey seconded.

    Mr. David Howe, the author of the Strategica Report in which the Organizational Chart is a part was introduced to speak. He explained that his Washington state- based, three person firm that specializes in strategic planning, organizational design and process redesign - works mostly with public sector clients. A good portion of their work is for California and Oregon election administrators. The California Secretary of State retained the company to do this report for San Francisco.

    Mr. Howe explained that the scope of the project was to formulate an organizational structure and staffing plan to build up experience and expertise in elections. Also, he wanted to help develop a facilities plan to improve utilization of space, movement of materials and make a better logistical set up for the City. The plan was to develop an infrastructure for administering safe, secure, accurate and accessible elections as well. Mr. Howe recommended a year-round staff of permanent employees. He said he toured five of the six DOE facilities and determined that three were substandard (one building was condemned). Further, he stated that the operations of the DOE have historically been treated as something that is temporary - "temporary" employees are brought in, the DOE finds "temporary" space, get the job done and then forgets about it. Mr. Howe explained that the attitude about how elections departments should work has changed in the last few years. It has become very apparent that the department must build a continuity of experience and expertise and to do this the department needs more permanent staff. In this way, the Department does not need to rebuild for each election and can hit the ground running. Additionally, the department must eliminate the distractions and risks of the substandard facilities and simplify the logistics as much as possible.

    Mr. Howe said that the organizational structure he designed creates a rational grouping of functions and can be implemented with existing staff for the most part. He said that key stakeholders in the plan, such as DHR, have been very encouraging. The five key divisions are administration, logistics, voter services, campaign services, and technology. Mr. Howe recommends a staff of 30 with about half that number being managers. During the off season, the managers work as staff. When there's an election, the staff explodes to over 200 - with the same number of managers, which is a ratio of 17 managers to 200 staff. This makes a good and flexible organizational structure.

    Mr. Howe stated that his recommendation regarding facilities is to create an elections operations center and reduce the number of facilities from six to three; minimize services in City Hall to candidate services and early voting; consolidate everything else into one facility to minimize the movement of materials and have visibility to the management structure in that one location.

    Mr. Howe's Strategica Report is supplied as the second addendum to these minutes.

    Commissioner Brenda Stowers asked why the storage facility in Alameda was not one of the sites Mr. Howe suggested be eliminated. Mr. Howe replied that this was a "dead end" facility. There is no movement of supplies once they are delivered there and archived for the required amount of time. Once that required time is met, the materials/ballots are destroyed. The cost for storage is good unless a cheaper one is found on the peninsula. He said that this was a minor issue and the Department had many more important ones to deal with first.

    Commissioner Stowers asked if Mr. Howe worked with DHR to arrive at the classifications shown in the Organizational Chart. Mr. Howe answered that he had several meetings with Anna Borja of DHR who assisted him in making his determinations. The Commissioner then asked if the Commission should approve the DHR codes or does the Commission want to give that ability to the Director. President Mendelson said that the Director and Mr. Howe had worked together on the chart and that the Commission would ask the Director for his opinion of the classifications.

    Commissioner Rosenthal thanked Mr. Howe and the Secretary of State's Office for providing his services.

    Director Arntz thanked the Commission for allowing him the opportunity to present his comments on this report. He said he had worked very closely with Mr. Howe and the classifications meet with his approval.

    Commissioner Rosenthal asked to withdraw her motion and present another instead. The Commissioner MOVED that the Commission adopt the organizational structure as presented by Strategica as the DOE's organizational structure as soon as is practicable after the fall 2002 election season. Commissioner Kenealey seconded this motion.

    President Mendelson asked the Director how much time he and Mr. Howe had spent together to create the report. Mr. Arntz replied that many hours were spent for this purpose. The Director stated that Mr. Howe brought a lot of expertise and experience with other election departments, looking at the past and looking with an eye to the future of voting to the project.

Public Comment

    Allen Nicholson, former foreman of the San Francisco Civil Grand Jury, which produced a report on the DOE a few years ago, strongly suggested reducing the number of precincts. Linda Crawford, personnel manager of the DOE, explained that trying to implement the organizational chart would not be a "slam dunk". She said procedures needed to be followed and would take awhile to implement. Peter Fries said that the presentation materials were unreadable and did not meet ADA requirements and the City was overrun with consultants.

MOTION 10-23-1

    To adopt the organizational structure of the Strategica Organizational and Facilities Review, Appended as Exhibit Two, as the Organizational Chart of the Department of Elections and that its implementation begin as soon as practicable after the fall 2002 election. Roll Call Vote: Kenealey - Yes, Rosenthal - Yes, Stowers - Yes, Shadoian - Yes, Mendelson - Yes. PASSED.

11. Items for Future Agendas

    Commissioner Shadoian suggested the Commission discuss HR 3295, the national bill on voting changes at a future meeting.

12. Public Comment

    Peter Fries stated that the organizational chart was barely readable and that he felt that five deputy directors were too many for the size of the department. He asked if the chart meant that the City was hiring as an 1844 a "Logistica" consultant. President Mendelson advised Mr. Fries to put his question in writing and the Commission Secretary would see that his question is answered.

Meeting Adjourned at 8:19 pm.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Addendum: President Michael Mendelson's Report

I.

INTRODUCTION

The San Francisco Charter mandates the Election Commission oversee all federal, state and county elections; furthermore, the Charter authorizes the Commission to set general policies for the Election Department. The Charter provision also mandates the Elections Department Director to run the Department's day-to-day operations.

II.

A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT'S

DAY-TO-DAY OPERATIONS.

The Elections Department functions pursuant to its operation manual. That document demonstrates the length and breadth of the Department's day-to-day operations.

The Department operates in the personnel area including hiring, promotion, termination, etc. It deals regularly with the Department of Human Resources to implement the City and County's various policies in these areas.

The day-to-day operations require the Director deal with vendors who provide a multiplicity of goods and services including, but not limited to, ballot cards, printers who produce the Voter Information Pamphlet, translators who produce the various multilingual documents legally required.

Elections staffing necessitates the use of temporary employees. This use can reach a high of 300 plus during peek election periods. Such temporary election cadre, in turn, generate their own space requirements.

Staffing requirements also necessitate full time employees use. Typically, such full time employees manage various units that make up the department. Such full time cadre, in turn, generate space requirements. Full time staff, prior to election, maintain various activities necessary to make the election happen, i.e. contracts with vendors, production of the Voter Information Pamphlet, etc.

The Elections Department is an information rich environment. A tour of the Department's facilities demonstrates computer super abundance. These computers have both simplified and made more complex the election process. Simplification results from computer's inherent ability to store, classify, and disgorge information at almost the speed of light. Such ability means efficient, vote processing.

Complexity results from the Department's dependence on computer technology. Because computer breakdown can have a catastrophic effect on the election process, the department must maintain a technical cadre that oversees the complex computer network to ensure reliability during critical use periods.

The Election Department must have space available to process the ballot cards. Such processing takes various forms; for example, counting absentee ballots and associated activities. Ballot processing includes retention and storage of the voted and unvoted ballot cards. When one considers the Elections Department, by law, must order, literally, millions of cards and retain such cards for canvassing purposes and then store the used ballots in case of recount, ballot logistics is a major space and personnel element in the Elections Department's planning.

San Francisco is divisible into some 640 precincts. Each precinct, on average, has three (3) people administering a polling place. Each polling place must provide tables, chairs, voting booths and the voting machinery. As a result, the polling place furniture and equipment storage is a significant concern.

The previous enumeration of the various year-round and election day specific activities is not all-inclusive. The enumeration demonstrates the breadth and magnitude of elements that go to make up the Election Department's responsibility and areas where such responsibilities lie both year-round and on any given election day.

The year-round operation and election day specific activities are mosaic-like in their primary characteristics; that is, each activity is a small piece of a larger whole that, when viewed from a reasonable distance, make a complete picture. The picture's appearance is a function of successful completion and inclusion of each small piece into that whole. The measure of Elections Department success is how well each of the small, individual, statutorily mandated activities is carried out. If done well, the election process results in a fair, efficient, and expeditious result.

III.

THE COMMISSION'S COMMENCEMENT ACTIVITIES

The Commission's creation and commencement as a supervisory body over the Elections Department is a new phenomenon in San Francisco. Previously, the Elections Department was administered as a City Department under the City Administrator's aegis. After Proposition E's passage in 2001, the Election Department became a "stand alone" operation subject to the Commission's authority and general control.

Consequently the Commission, consisting of seven members, each selected by a different elected official, assumed the obligation to create a new, independent, Elections Department. Such obligation, necessarily included the duty to look beyond the day-to-day operations of the Department and to plan the Department's general structure and organization.

Such strategic planning meant the Commission analyzed and evaluated the present "non-stand alone" operation to determine its strengths and weaknesses. To facilitate this evaluation, the California Secretary of State, Bill Jones, and his able deputy, John Mott-Smith, provided the Commission with the formable services of David Howe, a consultant specializing in evaluation and analysis of election operations.

Mr. Howe's report is the lynch pin upon which this tale hangs. It provides the insight, analysis, and recommendations that make possible the orderly transition from a department managed by City government to a "stand alone" operation supervised by an independent commission.

Future stability and efficient department operation is dependent upon three (3) critical components, structure, staffing, and space. The space component i.e., square footage necessary to house certain Election Department operations is open and obvious. Presently, the Department is scattered about in various, disparate physical locations including Brooks Hall, Pier 29, 240 Van Ness Avenue and some storage facilities in Alameda County. The Department needs adequate space to process absentee ballots as well as to provide room to do other Department activities. Notably, placement of the Election Department's now scattered sites "under one roof" would have two salutary effects; first, it would provide easier access for observers to monitor the vote counting process; second, it would provide easier statutorily required Sheriff coverage. Such "under one roof" Election Department operation would, in no way, diminish the Election Department presence in City Hall and the Department's traditional election eve events there. Room 48 would continue to function as the filing and information center for the Department. The majority of Elections services carried out presently at that address would remain. The Elections Commission would also retain its presence at City Hall as well.

Presently, staffing exists on a somewhat arbitrary basis. As election time looms, more temporary employees are hired. The most explicit example of how this irrational system operates is the Memo To Finance Committee, March 20, 2002 Finance Committee Meeting. The Board of Supervisors budget analyst determined that:

Overall, the Department anticipates spending an estimated $3,050,278 for temporary salaries in FY 2001-02, which is $2,150,275 or 239 percent more than the $900,000 originally budgeted. (emphasis added)

    The report continued:

In contrast, as shown above, the Department is underspending by $534,144 or 38 percent less than their budget of $1,405,144 for permanent salaries, because the Department of Elections has not filled 11.2 FTEs (full time employees) of their 24 FTE permanent budgeted positions, or a vacancy factor of 47 percent. Instead, the Department has continued to use temporary staff to perform the duties of the permanently budgeted positions. (emphasis added)

      The report continued:

This is a recurring problem for the Department, and similarly resulted in significant overspending the temporary salaries and underspending the permanent salaries in the previous years.

The creation of a full time, year-round staff would clearly assist in cost savings as well as produce more efficient elections operations.

      Because of the Elections Department's unique work pattern, the Commission will work with the Department of Human Resources to obtain its approval of special status for designated Election Department employees who would work during the Election Department up season.

      Presently, employee status within the Department is a hodge podge of various statuses from full time civil service, to provisional, to acting, to temporary. Staffing review must take into account reform and systemization of employee status.

      Ultimately, the efficiency and effectiveness of the Elections Department as a "stand alone" department results from the integration of space utilization and staffing under the broad aegis of the Department's structure. The Election Department's physical manifestation is its organizational chart. Previous Election Departments had no functioning operational chart.

The Commission must, at this relatively early time in its existence, given the Department's new "stand alone" status, emplace in a general department organizational plan, a year-round operation, that will result in an effective, efficient Department.

CONCLUSION

      The voter created Elections Commission and its charter-granted- authority to set general policies provides a unique opportunity to establish an election department that "stands alone" i.e. a department that is free from outside influences, is autonomous in its operations, and is able to manage efficiently and effectively City, state, and federal elections.

      The Commission has the authority to create general policies; further, it has the authority to ensure the means whereby its general policies are implemented are appropriate. The Commission must ensure that the Department's structure implements the Department's primary goal - fair, efficient, and effective elections; further, the Commission must insure the Department is properly staffed year-round to achieve success in the Department's primary goal.

      The Commission previously passed two general policies; the first provided for The Department's "under one roof" operation and second provided for the Department's adherence to Civil Service personnel rules.

The Commission's last general policy obligation is to create and implement a general department structure that supports fully a "stand alone" elections department. With this last general policy in place, the commission has passed the general policies necessary to implement a successful transition from a government agency to an independent-Commission-regulated department.

Addendum #2: Strategica Report.