To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body

March 08, 2001 Special

 

RULES COMMITTEE
OF THE
SUNSHINE ORDINANCE TASK FORCE

SPECIAL MEETING

MINUTES

Thursday, March 8, 2001
5:30 p.m., City Hall, Room 406

Committee Members:
Bob Planthold, Chair; Sue Cauthen; Ted Kowalczuk; Tuesday Ray

Call to Order

Roll Call: All present

1. Minutes of February 13, 2001

    Approved. (Ray/Kowalczuk)

2. Change of By-laws Section Article VII- Attendance

    Discussion to change the permissive "may" to the mandatory "shall" in Article VII - Attendance section. Moved to recommend an amendment to the by-laws to substitute "shall" for "may" in the attendance section regarding notification to the Board of Supervisors. (Cauthen/Kowalczuk)

3. Task Force by-laws rule regarding guidelines on numbers of committee absences allowable or prudent

    Discussion held regarding regular committee absences; would be difficult to track three absences for committee meetings and three absences for regular meetings; either make it six meetings to include both committee and regular meetings; possibly have excused absences; members may not know there is a work expectation other than regular Task Force attendance; let persons know ahead of time; could have reporting by committee chair to the SOTF chair; possibly develop prospective guidelines for next cycle of vacancies; possibly have a "shall" for Task Force and "may" for committees to take notice of special situations; another way of handling this is to possibly have four on a committee; possibly include in future vacancy notices that committee work is a part of the work of the Task Force.

    Jackie Minor stated there is no other group that has an ordinance that specifically says you must adopt by-laws addressing attendance; we found no by-laws for any committee addressing attendance.

    Moved that for future appointments, if a committee member has more than three absences per committee of regular meetings, the chair of the committee will report to the chair of the Task Force; and secondly that it will be stressed in the application packet for prospective new members that committee work is a big part of the Task Force and all members are expected to serve on a committee. (Ray/Kowalczuk) (Cauthen no)

    Chair Planthold stated at the present time the full Task Force gets three absences before any notification; this committee is recommending also that more than three committee absences per committee generate some notification to the Task Force Chair; and there be some information to the Board of Supervisors for prospective new members. Current by-laws indicate two meetings missed generate a warning letter to the member; after the third absence the Board of Supervisors is notified.

    Discussion was held among the members that once two absences have occurred in a committee that the committee chair notify the member; upon three absences the committee chair would go to the Task Force Chair.

4. Recommendations on power/authority of Chair of SOTF to act without specific authorization/approval by the full SOTF

    Discussion regarding role of Chair of Task Force as spokesperson of Task Force; Chair Planthold stated he was concerned about having to authorize the Chair to invite specific expert or person to talk with the Task Force on an agenda issue; might have a debate on this; nothing in Roberts Rules of Order says the Chair needs authorization to invite anybody or write a letter seeking information from anybody.

    Member Ray stated that it had been agreed that a letter would be written; no thought that the letter would have to come back for approval.

    Member Kowalczuk stated that generally a Chair would speak in our voice without us having that voice-does the Chair come for consensus first, or a voice first.

    Member Cauthen stated there is broad latitude for the Chair to act; not necessary to micro-manage everything the Chair does.

    Task Force Chair commented this is also an issue for chairs of committees; needs to be precedent for actions taken; need to clarify in writing of what the Chair is empowered to do; think where there has been an precedent or an obvious agreement, that within that context the Chair has to be free to act; Chair needs to justify what Chair has done or not done.

    Member Cauthen commented we have broad agenda of what we are about; a chair of a committee or Task Force has to have the freedom to perform the job as chair; would favor giving the Chair the powers to execute the business of the Task Force; to make the group efficient the Chair needs to have powers to act in between meetings.

    Chair Planthold commented he is hearing from discussion that we clarify the empowerment of the Chair; the Chair has the powers to execute the duties of the Task Force; and possibly go to the Task Force and ask members what they want to do about the Chair with regard to actions or duties of Chair.

    Discussion held regarding adopting the concept of the Asian Art Museum by-laws section on the President. (P. 3, Section 4 b)

    Moved to report to the full Task Force that it is the Rules Committee interpretation that the Chair of the Task Force, subject to the control of the Task Force, has general supervision, direction and control over the Task Force activities; and has such general powers and duties of management as shall reasonably be necessary to carry out the duties of Chair. (Cauthen/Ray)

5. Public Comment

    No public comment.

The meeting adjourned at 4:40 p.m.

Donna L. Hall, Administrator

 

Last updated: 8/18/2009 1:56:50 PM