CSS Styling 3 Columns and Inset Divs w Titles

Introduction

San Francisco’s streets represent 25% of city land. Streets are our most important public resource, in large part because they are shared equally by all residents of San Francisco. Our streets are not just about transportation, but also recreation, social and economic activity, and ecological performance. The way in which we design our streets can help support these activities.

Over the years our streets have been transformed through efforts such as the Great Streets Project and the 2011 Road Repaving and Street Safety Bond, using the Better Streets Plan as a guide. These projects enhance the public realm, improve the transportation function of the street, and create other economic, environmental and social benefits.

Streetscape Projects

Streetscape projects improve the street environment for all people by providing space for mobility, social and recreational activities. Streetscape projects enhance the aesthetic and ecological qualities of the street, improve safety, and enrich the street’s character and identity. Streetscape projects could include improvements such as sidewalk extensions, street trees, sidewalk landscaping, green infrastructure, street furniture, pocket parks, and other amenities.

The specific project elements will depend on a number of factors including the project budget, existing conditions of the street and community feedback. Below is a table which outlines the types of improvements you might see, depending on the specifics of the project.

19th Avenue Median Greening

Very Light Complete Street Enhancements

Description: Includes a mix of pedestrian and bike enhancements and greening elements, but would potentially not include full list of enhancements desired by the community (e.g. separated bike lanes, sidewalk widening)

Potential Scope of Work: Infill street tree planting (there are already many healthy trees on the corridor), bike lane striping, median planting, and upgrades to existing street lights.

Examples: Lower Polk, Van Ness Avenue, San Bruno Avenue, 19th Avenue Median (see image above) and Point Lobos.

Cost Per Block: $100k - $500k

19th Avenue Median Greening

Light Complete Street Enhancements

Description: Includes a mix of pedestrian and bike enhancements and greening elements, but would potentially not include the full list of enhancements desired by the community (e.g. separated bike lanes, sidewalk widening). NOTE: To date, most complete streets delivered by the city have cost more than $1M block or did not include repaving.

Potential Scope of Work: Repaving, infill street tree planting (there are already many healthy trees on the corridor), a limited number of bus bulbouts, ADA improvements, bike lane striping, median reconstruction, and upgrades to existing streetlights. Alternatively, this could be complete streets with short blocks such as Leland Avenue and Broadway Street.

Examples: Folsom Streetscape (19th to Cesar Chavez) and the Divisadero Streetscape (see image above)

Cost Per Block: $500k - $1.2M

19th Avenue Median Greening

Full Complete Street Enhancements

Description: Includes substantial street and sidewalk enhancements that result in a more thematic appearance of the corridor.

Potential Scope of Work: Substantial pedestrian and bike improvements (such as sidewalk widening and separated bike lanes), street greening, street lighting, transit station upgrades, and reconfigured traffic patterns.

Examples: Valencia Streetscape (see image above) and the planned Jefferson, Masonic, 2nd Street Streetscape projects.

Cost Per Block: $1.2M - $2.5M

Purpose & Outcomes

The goal of this project is to identify where the City should make streetscape improvements to have the greatest benefit, given limited funding. At the end of the project, the City will develop a list of priority streetscape project locations by Supervisorial District. Funding for streetscape improvements will be prioritized at these locations. These streets represent places where people are walking OR would walk if the conditions were better. The factors used to define these streets include population density, transit ridership, land use, and priority pedestrian streets identified in streetscape plans. To view the specific criteria, click here

Methodology

This project utilizes a data-driven approach to prioritize locations for future streetscape projects. The approach similar to WalkFirst Phase II, considers three different strategies for how the City could prioritize future projects. For each strategy data inputs were identified and mapped. Metrics were also identified to see how the strategies compare to one another. Based on feedback received, a preferred strategy was selected, using inputs from Strategy 1 and 3. Below is a map of each strategy along with the goal, data inputs and an infographic that summarizes key findings. Each map shows the streetscape network and the streets that rank the highest for that strategy. 

Scenario 1 map. STRATEGY 1

Invest where people walk, blocks with the most pedestrian activity

Strategy Goal:
Prioritize locations with high levels of pedestrian activity (top 20%).

Data Inputs:
- Pedestrian volumes: current + forecasted growth (x5)

- Transit ridership at nearby stations
Scenario 2 map. STRATEGY 2

Tap into economic potential, blocks with  vacancies and recent business growth


Strategy Goal:
Prioritize locations with underutilized buildings yet actively growing businesses (top 20%).

Data Inputs:
- Presence of vacant storefronts and lots (x3)

- Number of change of use permits, miscellaneous permits, and new business licenses
Scenario 3 map. STRATEGY 3

Target physical deficiencies, blocks with the worst pedestrian infrastructure and environment

Strategy Goal:
Prioritize locations with poor pedestrian infrasructure and/or surrounding environment conditions (top 20%).

Data Inputs:
- Score on SFDPH's Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index (PEQI), approximated version

- Including traffic volume; speed limit; street/sidewalk
Scenario 4 map. PREFERRED STRATEGY 4

Prioritize blocks with high pedestrian activity, poor pedestrian environment, and neighborhood commercial street types  

Strategy Goal:
Prioritize locations with high levels of pedestrian activity, poor pedestrian infrastructure and/or surrounding environment, and Neighborhood Commercial street type designation (top 33%).

Data Inputs:
- Pedestrian volumes: current + forecasted growth

- Pedestrian Tourist corridors

- Score on SFDPH's Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index (PEQI), approximated version

- Neighborhood Commercial corridors

 

 
Links & Resources