Historic Preservation Commission - January 20, 2016 - Minutes
SAN FRANCISCO
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes
Commission Chambers Room 400,
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102-4689
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
12:30 p.m.
Regular Hearing
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Wolfram, Hyland, Hasz, Johnck, Matsuda, Pearlman, Johns
COMMISSIONER ABSENT: Pearlman
THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY PRESIDENT WOLFRAM AT 12:38 PM
STAFF IN ATTENDANCE:  John Rahaim - Director of Planning, Jeff Joslin - Director of Current Planning, Tom DiSanto - Chief Administrative Officer, Eiliesh Tuffy, Justin Greving, Susan Parks, Nick Perry, Shelley Caltagirone, Tim Frye - Historic Preservation Coordinator, Jonas P. Ionin – Commission Secretary
SPEAKER KEY:
+ indicates a speaker in support of an item;
= indicates a neutral speaker or a speaker who did not indicate support or opposition.
Hearing Materials are available at: Commission Hearing Broadcasts: |
A. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time, members of the public may address the Commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the Commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. Each member of the public may address the Commission for up to three minutes.
None
B. DEPARTMENT MATTERS
Tim Frye, Preservation Coordinator:
The Director's Report was included in your packets; happy to answer any questions should you have them. Â2 Review of Past Events at the Planning Commission, Staff Report and Announcements
Tim Frye, Preservation Coordinator:
A few items to share with you, last week the Board of Appeals heard the appeal to the Van Ness BRT Certificate of Appropriateness issued by this commission in, I believe, November. The Board of Appeals heard from the appellant as well as MTA and the Planning Department staff on behalf of the HPC. The Board of Appeals had a number of questions regarding, as you recall, the appeal was around the removal of the trolley poles and also the removal of trees as part of the project. The Board of Appeals did raise concerns about the removal of all the trolley poles; I would say the line of questioning was going towards the direction of wanting to save more, but the Board of Appeals felt that this commission’s decision in asking MTA to retain 4 seemed appropriate and then defers to you on that matter. The Board of Appeals also had a number of questions about why the trees were/had to be removed; however, MTA did talk at length about the number of trees that were going to be removed and the fact that there will be actually more trees replanted in this area after completion of the project. So with that the Board voted 3 to 1 to deny the appeal so the Commission’s C of A is upheld in this case and as you know the MTA will be coming back to you within 6 months to discuss a redesign of the bus shelter and also have a plan on how to rehabilitate and retain those 4 trolley poles that there was a lot of discussion about at that previous hearing. Two other items and more just updates, one to remind you the Cowell House is still pending at the Board of Supervisors with the New Year and some discussions with the supervisor we’re seeking sponsorship of that item so it could move forward to Land Use Committee. The supervisor of that district is interested in a site tour so we are trying to arrange a site tour prior to any further discussions. Then second, in 90 2nd Street, the Bourdette Building is also pending at the Board of Supervisors and again, we're working with the supervisor’s office in that district to also seek sponsorship and we’ll have more information hopefully at the next hearing. That concludes my announcements for you today unless you have additional questions. Thank you.
C. COMMISSION MATTERS
3. President’s Report and Announcements
None
4. Consideration of Adoption:
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION: Adopted
AYES: Wolfram, Hyland, Hasz, Johnck, Johns, Matsuda
ABSENT: Pearlman5. Commission Comments & Questions
Commissioner Johns:
I don’t have a disclosure other than I've become recently quite interested in the I. Magnin Building, the latter of two located on the southwest corner of Stockton and Geary, which I just learned today does not seem to have any protection other than being in a district. I think it was started in 1903 or 5 rather and rebuilt after the fire and earthquake and then substantially totally remodeled by Timothy Pflueger in the late 40s and I think we should address appropriately designating that building so that it can be preserved and not fiddled with in the future.
Commissioner Johnck:
I want to let the commissioners know of a great educational experience I had this past weekend with the Stone Foundation; this is an international organization of stone masons. They conducted a series of lectures at the De Young Museum regarding the stories of stone in the San Francisco landscape and we studied the oldest stone building in San Francisco, 1857; does anyone imagine what that might be? It’s on corner of California and Montgomery. It is now the Omni Hotel but it was the Parrot Building built by Mr. Parrot in 1857. I thought perhaps Fort Point might been close on but anyway and then the U.S. Mint; we studied the U.S. Mint as well as the James Flood Building and there was some great lectures on materiality, texture, how stone is worked, the power of stone and the landscape and as we consider the public realm here today. I think it’s very timely to think about stones so I learned a lot and met a lot of great stone masons so I just want to let the commissioners know about that. So anytime we have future discussions on stone I can become your expert.
Commissioner Hyland:
I have several items. First off, we, Ellen and I, Commissioner Johnck and I are on the Waterfront Plan Update Working Group and we had our second meeting last week. It was just a general overview of the different entities that we’re going to be cooperating with: BCDC, State Lands, Port of San Francisco, Planning Department and a few others, so there’s really nothing to report on that but the meetings are continuing. We'll give updates as appropriate. Second thing, I've spoken to Supervisor Campos’ office as well as Supervisor Peskin’s office about the agenda item today about the Legacy Business Registry and Fund and then lastly I’ll be recusing myself on the first regular agenda item for Trinity Episcopal as it’s my former firm that’s doing that project.
President Wolfram:
Thank you. I just have one disclosure which is that I spoke today with Lacey Bubnash from Architectural Resources Group about the Trinity Church project.6. Election of Officers
SPEAKERS: None
ACTION: Elected Andrew Wolfram as President and Aaron Hyland as Vice President
AYES: Hyland, Johns, Matsuda, Johnck, Wolfram, Hasz
ABSENT: PearlmanUpon appointment of officers, Commissioners Hasz, Commissioner Pearlman, Commissioner Hyland were appointed as members of the Architectural Review Committee with President Wolfram as Ex-Officio; Commissioner Matsuda and Commissioner Hyland appointed as members of the Cultural Heritage Asset Committee.
D. REGULAR CALENDARÂ
7. 2016-000613CRV Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â (T. DISANTO: (415) 575-9113)
FY 2016-2018 PROPOSED DEPARTMENT BUDGET & WORK PROGRAM - Review the balanced Fiscal Year 2016-2018 department budget and work program
Preliminary Recommendation: None - InformationalSPEAKERS: John Rahaim – Budget introduction
Tom DiSanto – Budget presentation
Tim Frye – Preservation WP Budget
ACTION: None – Informational8. 2015-009585COA                              (E. TUFFY: (415) 575-9191)
1668 BUSH STREET- north side of Bush Street between Gough Street and Franklin Street; Assessor’s Block 0665, Lot 015. Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to conduct exterior façade repairs and interior seismic upgrades at the Trinity Episcopal Church (Landmark No. 65). Work to include exterior Colusa sandstone cleaning, repairs and stabilization, window repair and repainting, upgrades to accessibility, life safety and seismic programs, replacement roofing material, mechanical, electrical and plumbing work. A new egress door for the first floor accessory theater space is proposed to be added on the rear elevation of the building’s North Wing. Proposed seismic upgrades include vertical cores within the south perimeter wall and selective use of reinforced concrete shear walls. The subject property is located within a RM-4 (Residential – Mixed, High Density) Zoning District, and 80-A Height and Bulk District. Designed by architect Arthur Page Brown and completed in 1893, the subject property is home to the oldest Episcopal congregation in California. The church was granted local landmark status in 1974.
Preliminary Recommendation: Approve with ConditionsSPEAKERS: = Eiliesh Tuffy – Staff presentation
+ Lacey Bubnash – Project presentation
+ Patricia Cunningham – Site operation
+ Rory Walsh – Courtyard door
+ George Tigell – Courtyard door
+ Cynthia Kravens – Support
+ Patrick Andersen – Changes now will add an unnecessary burden
ACTION: Approved as amended without conditions
AYES: Wolfram, Hasz, Johnck, Johns, Matsuda
RECUSED: Hyland
ABSENT: Pearlman
MOTION: 02749. 2015-005005FEDÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â (J. GREVING: (415) 575-9169)
3455 VAN NESS AVENUE – northernmost end of Van Ness Avenue just south of McDowell Avenue; Assessor’s Block 0409, Lot 002. Request for Review and Comment on the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the proposed improvement and seismic upgrade of Pump Station No. 2, pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The subject property is individually listed in the National Register and is a contributor to the National Register-listed Fort Mason Historic District. Pump Station No. 2 is located within a P (Public) Zoning District, and an OS (Open Space) Height and Bulk District. Constructed in 1913 in the Mission Revival Style, Pump Station No. 2 was designed to pump water from the bay to feed the Auxiliary Water Supply System (AWSS).
Preliminary Recommendation: Recommend the Planning Director (on behalf of the Department) to participate as a signatory on the MOASPEAKERS: = Justin Greving – Staff presentation
+ Scott McPhersen – Project presentation
ACTION: Recommended the Director participate as a signatory10.                                                                   (S. PARKS: (415) 575-9101)
LANDMARK DESIGNATION WORK PROGRAM – Discussion of the HPC’s Landmark Designation Work Program, prioritization and status of pipeline projects.
Preliminary Recommendation: Review and CommentSPEAKERS: Susan Parks – Staff presentation
ACTION: Reviewed and Commented11. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â (N. PERRY: (415) 575-9066)
CIVIC CENTER PUBLIC REALM PLAN – Informational presentation on the Civic Center Public Realm Plan. The Civic Center Public Realm Plan is an interdepartmental project led by the Planning Department that will create a cohesive, long-term vision for the design and activation of the Civic Center’s plazas, streets, and other public spaces. The plan area is roughly bounded by Gough Street, Golden Gate Avenue, Market Street, and Fell Street and encompasses the Civic Center Landmark District. The Public Realm plan is part of the City’s larger strategy to improve the Civic Center as both a neighborhood gathering space and a public commons for all San Franciscans. This informational presentation will provide an introduction to the plan and describe its background, goals, scope, and timeline.
Preliminary Recommendation: None – InformationalSPEAKERS: Neil Hrushowy – Staff introduction
Nick Perry – Staff presentation
James Haas – Neighborhood park, neglect
ACTION: None – Informational12.                                        (S. CALTAGIRONE: (415) 558-6625)
LEGACY BUSINESS REGISTRY DISCUSSION - Request for Review and Comment on the review process for nominations to the Legacy Business Registry. Regina Dick-Endrizzi from the Mayor’s Office of Small Business will present information on the recently established Legacy Business Registry and the Legacy Business Historic Preservation Fund. As outlined in Section 2A.242(b)(2) of the amended Administrative Code, the Historic Preservation Commission may advise the Small Business Commission on nominations to the Registry. This hearing will provide an opportunity for the Commission and members of the public to comment on the Historic Preservation Commission’s review process for Registry nominations. Please contact Shelley Caltagirone at 415.558.6625 for more information.
Preliminary Recommendation: Review and CommentSPEAKERS: = Shelley Caltagirone – Staff introduction & presentation
+ Regina Dick-Endrezzi – Small Business Commission presentation
+ Hillary Ronin, Aide to Supervisor Campos – Support, point system, consent calendar
+ Aide to Supervisor Peskin – Support, point system, consent calendar
+ Desiree Smith – Qualitative and historical information
ACTION: Reviewed and Commented
ADJOURNMENT - 3:34 PM
ADOPTED FEBRUARY 3, 2016